Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Springsteen shares a dose of protest with fans


Bergen County Record

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

By JERRY DeMARCO
STAFF WRITER

Bruce Springsteen's acolytes can recall a time when their particular politics didn't affect whether they enjoyed his shows.

Not anymore.

How can it not when, during the first of two sold-out nights at Continental Arena on Tuesday, he invoked a fictional "Gypsy Biker" killed in a war waged by "profiteers" and "speculators"? Or when he defiantly asked who'll be the "Last to Die" for a "mistake"?

Both were from his latest album, "Magic," whose folkish title song is an anti-Bush allegory about how those desperate to believe can be fooled by a cunning leader's sleight-of-hand.

"Trust none of what you hear and less of what you see," Springsteen sang to more than 20,000 strong, his strum-and-twang giving way to mournful wailing with his wife, Patti Scialfa.

This was no illusion, though.

Nuggets like "She's the One" and the pre-fame "Thundercrack" were certainly appealing -- magic in the night, if you will.

But Tuesday's two-hour convocation was steeped in '60s-era protest music. It was a political rally wrapped in power chords, coming as it did as the nation begins ramping up to the presidential primaries.

The masses bopped in time to the bouncy "Livin' in the Future," even as Springsteen sang of a failure that could well have been George Bush's reelection: "My faith's been torn asunder/ Tell me is that rollin' thunder/ Or just the sinking sound/ Of something righteous goin' under?"

"New Jersey! Is there anybody alive out there?" he shouted, launching the show with "Radio Nowhere," a curiously radio-friendly rant against a taste-challenged culture. Springsteen then leaped into the inspiring "No Surrender," coaxing sidekick Steve Van Zandt to the microphone and closing with the final chords of Elvis Costello's "Radio Radio."

Counting off the songs, Springsteen steered the black-clad E Streeters through a series of set pieces, driving them home at times with sonic guitar or wailing harmonica. He showed his harp-playing chops on a stomping, ZZ Top-styled "Reason to Believe," then sent the long-timers into a frenzy with the machine-gun spray of "Candy's Room."



Playing behind him for the first time since he stumped for John Kerry on the 2004 "Move On" tour, the band had its flaws, their collective rhythm tripping up at times. They were tightest on the newer material -- guitarist Nils Lofgren juggling scorching riffs with Van Zandt; Danny Federici and Roy Bittan twinkling through the lush orchestration; violinist Suzie Tyrell, bassist Gary W. Tallent, and Scialfa filling their roles; and the icons Van Zandt, Clarence Clemons and Max Weinberg forming the best supporting cast since that now-defunct cable show about the anxious mob boss from West Caldwell.

At 58, Bruce is no longer the hardest-working man in show business. He doesn't stalk the stage anymore and pretty much kept his feet planted during a "Dancing in the Dark" encore -- a modern-day version of Elvis Presley shot from the waist up. He nonetheless stirred the beer-swigging throng, who responded with their own wall of sound each time the pride of Freehold thrust his fist or fretboard into the air.

Springsteen teased the Johnny-come-latelys during the "Thundercrack" encore, saying "they were louder in Philly" the other night. Moments later, they sang along in full throat on the requisite houselights-up "Born to Run."

None of the tunes from "Magic" had the anthemic weight of "Born to Run" -- or that of "The Rising" or "Lonesome Day," which he sprinkled into the set. But the new numbers had the same edge, as well as a familiar sonic ring. And by delivering it so soberly, with nary a butt wiggle or deep-knee bend, Springsteen may have found a compromise between his quieter performances and the rock-and-roll traveling redemption shows that have now receded into history. Either that or his rheumatism was acting up.

For anyone who could hear him through the din, Springsteen delivered a state of our union underpinned by genuine love for country.

"My father said, 'Son, we're lucky in this town/ It's a beautiful place to be born,' " he sang in the shimmering "Long Walk Home." " 'It just wraps its arms around you/ Nobody crowds you, nobody goes it alone./ The flag flyin' over the courthouse/ Means certain things are set in stone./Who we are and what we'll do and what we won't.' "

The rally closed with the jig (or is it reel?) of "American Land," from the Seeger sessions, as Tyrell hit a jaunty stride and follow-the-bouncing ball lyrics flashed on the jumbo screens above the stage. It was at that point that Springsteen really got into the act, marching from one side of the stage to the other, waving his pick hand at the crowd.

Whether they'll vote with him or not, Springsteen pulled the neat trick of making his audience a community. Like one of his idols, the late Harry Chapin, he reminded everyone that no matter what their individual intelligence or background, no matter how dislocated and alienated they may feel -- from friends, loved ones, colleagues -- they could connect with one another, at least for a couple of hours.

What they did once they left the revival tent was up to them.



* * *

Set list:

1. Radio Nowhere
2. No Surrender
3. Lonesome Day
4. Gypsy Biker
5. Magic
6. Reason to Believe
7. Candy's Room
8. She's the One
9. Livin' in the Future
10. The Promised Land
11. Darkness on the Edge of Town
12. Brilliant Disguise
13. Darlington County
14. Devil's Arcade
15. The Rising
16. Last to Die
17. Long Walk Home
18. Badlands

First encore:

19. Girls in Their Summer Clothes
20. Thundercrack
21. Born to Run

Second encore:

22. Dancing in the Dark
23. American Land

BRRRUUUCEE!! His concert is "Magic"



Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 10/10/07

BY KELLY-JANE COTTER
MUSIC WRITER

EAST RUTHERFORD — With his new tour underway and his new music well received, Bruce Springsteen took the stage at the Meadowlands last night (Tuesday, Oct. 9) with confidence and determination.

"Good evening, fellow New Jerseyans, neighbors and friends," Springsteen said with characteristic good cheer.

Tuesday's concert with the E Street Band was the first of four area shows in Springsteen's official "Magic" tour, which continues at Continental Airlines Arena for a second show tonight and moves across the Hudson to Madison Square Garden next week. Last week's concerts in Asbury Park, great as they were, go down as "rehearsal shows" in the official record-keeping of the tour.

"Magic," Springsteen's first effort with the E Street Band since "The Rising," is an album laced with despair and shot through with outrage. The lyrics, sobering and melancholy, lament the fallen in Iraq and criticize the federal government's methods and policies in the post-9/11 climate.

What has made "Magic" such a chart-topping success, however, is the music behind the message. The songs rock, with strong beats and fluid melodies.

The mournful wail of guitar on "Gypsy Biker" set the mood Tuesday night, reverberating around the arena like a ghost. "Livin' In The Future," a song of justified paranoia, became all the more poignant when followed by the clear-eyed tenacity of "Promised Land."

Springsteen's awe-inspiring catalog of songs fared well in the set list, with "Born To Run" as exhilarating as ever. "Dancing In The Dark" and "Brilliant Disguise" were worthy additions to a two-hour concert that celebrated melody as well as message,
The extended introduction to "Candy's Room," with Max Weinberg's drumsticks tapping in feverish rhythm, deepened the tension of the song. The band then blasted into "She's The One" without resting a beat, thrilling the audience with a one-two punch of classic Bruce.



For the most part, Springsteen let the songs do the talking, though he introduced several tracks from "Magic," with explanations and warnings. The CIA's torture of detainees, he said, may well leave an indelible mark on American culture, becoming as much a part of "the American picture" as the things we cherish, from "cheeseburgers and Max's hot dogs at the Jersey Shore" to "the Bill of Rights, just below Max's hot dogs, and Clarence 'Big Man' Clemons."

Ah, yes, Clarence Clemons, saxophonist and on-stage foil. The mere mention of the man brought fans to their feet. There was quite a lot of support for the E Streeters at the Meadowlands, with fans carrying placards that read "Big Man" for Clemons, and "Mighty Max" for drummer Max Weinberg.

All with good reason. Springsteen's longtime bandmates brought passion and precision to every song.

The only flash and dazzle in the spare production came from audience members, who waved their cell phones to demand an encore, an effective new tool in smoke-free arenas. Hundreds of glowing cell phones outshone the cigarette lighters of yesteryear.

Video screens on either side of the stage offered fans dramatic close-ups of Springsteen at the microphone and guided their attention to specific band members at various points in a song. This was especially helpful when the camera zeroed in on Roy Bittan at the piano, because most of the audience could not see Bittan's hands moving across the keys.

Before the concert began, long lines formed at concession stands and in rest rooms, and excitement built among fans.

Joseph Maurice, 38, of Glen Rock, first caught Springsteen in concert during the "Born In The U.S.A." tour of 1984. Maurice found the "Magic" album appealing because the music reminds him of the classic tunes Springsteen crafted in the '80s.

"I like it because it goes back to some of the older sounds," Maurice said. "It helps that he's back with the E Street Band."

Meegan Motisi, 32, of New Rochelle, is a second-generation Bruce fan, having first heard the music from her father's record collection.

"My brother and I know every single song, every single word, because my father played the music so often while we were growing up," Motisi said. "Now when I got to shows, I bring my father home a T-shirt."

The Meadowlands concert was the first Springsteen show for Ali Donohue, 17, of Westfield, who normally gravitates to punk, ska, hardcore and indie rock.
"My dad is a fan," she explained.

Her father, Tim Donohue, 45, was pleased to introduce his daughter to "the best live show there is."

Ali Donohue was game, saying, "I'm a fan of New Jersey in general. I really like living here and being from here, and I feel Bruce Springsteen really embodies that."



The set list follows:

1."Radio Nowhere"
2. "No Surrender"
3. "Lonesome Day"
4. "Gypsy Biker"
5. "Magic"
6. "Reason To Believe"
7. "Candy's Room"
8. "She's The One"
9. "Livin' In The Future"
10. "Promised Land"
11. "Darkness On The Edge Of Town"
12. "Brillliant Disguise"
13. "Darlington County"
14. "Devil's Arcade"
15. "The Rising"
16. "Last To Die"
17. "Long Walk Home"
18. "Badlands"
(encores)
19. "Girls In Their Summer Clothes"
20. "Thundercrack"
21. "Born To Run"
22. "Dancing In The Dark"
23. "American Land"

John Stossel: Medical Competition Works for Patients

October 10, 2007

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/

Health-care costs overall have been rising faster than inflation, but not all medical costs are skyrocketing. In a few pockets of medicine, costs are down while quality is up.

Dr. Brian Bonanni has an unusual medical practice. His office is open Saturdays. He e-mails his patients and gives them his cell-phone number.

"I need to be available 24 hours a day," he says. "I want to be there when a patient has questions, and I want to be reachable."

I'll bet your doctor doesn't say that. Bonanni knows he has to please his patients, not some insurance company or the government, because he's paid by his patients. He's a laser eye surgeon. Insurance rarely covers what he does: reshaping eyes so people can see without glasses.

His patients shop around before coming to him. They ask a question that people relying on insurance don't ask: "How much will that cost?"

"I can't get away with not telling the patient how much exactly it's going to cost," Bonanni says. "No one would put up with it. And the difference of a hundred dollars sometimes makes their decision for them."

He has to compete for his patients' business. One result of that is lower prices. And while the procedure got cheaper, it also got better. Today's lasers are faster and more precise.

Prices have fallen and quality has risen in other medical fields where most people pay for care themselves, like cosmetic surgery. Consumer power works -- even in medicine.

When government and insurance companies are kept away from the transaction, good new things happen.

A doctor in Tennessee I talked to publishes his low prices, such as $40 for an office visit.

Most doctors would say you can't make money this way. But Dr. Robert Berry told me you can. "Last year, I made about the average of what a primary-care physician makes in this country," he said.

Berry doesn't accept insurance. That saves him money because he doesn't have to hire a staff to process insurance claims, and he never has to fight with companies to get paid.

His mostly uninsured patients save money, too. Unlike doctors trapped in the insurance maze, Berry works with his patients to find ways to save them money.

"It's coming out of their pockets. And they're afraid. They don't know how much it's going to cost. So I can tell them, 'OK, you have heartburn. Let's start out with generic Zantac, which costs around five dollars a month.'" When his patients ask about expensive prescription medicines they see advertised on television, he tells them, "They're great medicines, but why don't you try this one first and see if it works?"

Sometimes the $4 pills from Wal-Mart are just as good as the $100 ones.

Speaking of Wal-Mart, medical clinics are popping up in Wal-Mart stores and in other similar markets. The clinics offer people with simple problems like sore throats and ear infections relatively hassle-free care ... cheap. Almost everything costs $59 or less. And the clinics are typically open seven days a week.

Grace-Marie Turner, president of the Galen Institute, a health-policy research organization, explains how these clinics thrive: "They're figuring how to do something faster, better, cheaper! They're responding to consumer demand because they see that they might make some money on this."

When consumers pay for medicine themselves, saving insurance for the big things, and doctors deal directly with consumers, doctors begin to compete. They start posting prices and work to keep them low.

And consumers gain more control of their health care. Instead of governments and insurance companies deciding for patients, patients decide.

Competition gives consumers more choices. And choice gives them power. Remember that when you hear a politician promise to make health case accessible and affordable through the force of government.

Copyright 2007 Creators Syndicate Inc.

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Time has come for classy Joe to go



Ken Davidoff
Newsday
October 9, 2007

So we have a seventh straight season without a Yankees parade up the Canyon of Heroes, and barring a shocking change of heart by both George Steinbrenner and his front-office lieutenants, Joe Torre has managed his last game in pinstripes.

The dismissal of Torre will be a sad move for many people in the Yankees organization and the fan base (although that fan support has dwindled). But it will be the right move.

It's time for the Yankees to move forward in their organizational renovation, and that should include a new manager. Just like any industry, beliefs have changed significantly in baseball since the Yankees brought Torre aboard in 1996, and a manager's responsibilities and expectations have been modified accordingly.

1. Torre's $7 million salary has never seemed more outdated. Managers' salaries have not increased in conjunction with those of the players, because most organizations feel that a manager simply isn't important enough to earn that kind of money.

2. Managers are much more extensions of their front office, philosophically, than they once were. While Torre and Yankees general manager Brian Cashman have an excellent personal relationship - Cashman battled to save Torre's job a year ago - Torre and Cashman aren't entirely on the same page when it comes to player deployment.

This isn't really about the seven straight "disappointing" postseasons, because October brings such randomness with its short series. Even if those transgressions hurt Steinbrenner the most, the more rational decision-makers will cite the other issues as the reason for change.

First comes the money, since that served as a primary impetus last year for bringing back Torre. Cashman and the now-departed Steve Swindal argued that it didn't make sense to pay Torre $7 million for a year's vacation while paying a second person to manage the team.



Now that Torre is off the books, however, the only way you could justify such an extravagant salary - with the Cubs' Lou Piniella ranking second at $3.5 million - would be if Torre were winning the World Series every year.

As for player deployment, Torre is the first person to say that, all things being equal, he prefers veteran players to youngsters. That's not the way of the baseball world anymore. Cheap, durable, versatile youngsters rule the day, a trend that Cashman has endorsed wholeheartedly.

Torre has improved in this area; witness the development and importance of kids like Robinson Cano, Melky Cabrera and Game 3 winner Phil Hughes. Nevertheless, if you followed this season closely enough, you saw that Torre let rookies like Shelley Duncan and Edwar Ramirez wither away from a lack of use, while going to relievers like Scott Proctor and Luis Vizcaino so often that he wore them down. With so many talented youngsters now in the Yankees' farm system, you want to make sure you fully trust the person using them.

What the Yankees aren't sure they can replace - whether it's with Don Mattingly, Joe Girardi or someone else - is Torre's ability to guide the team through the grind of a 162-game season, replete with the pressures from ownership and the media. No one else has even attempted such a task, as when Buck Showalter managed the Yankees back in 1995, he dealt with a media corps that was a fraction of what it is now.

Nevertheless, it's worth noting, when discussing how Torre guided the team from a 21-29 record to the American League wild card this year, that plenty of other managers have experience with midseason turnarounds. This season alone, Piniella's Cubs, the Phillies and the Rockies went from oblivion to October, just like the Yankees. Granted, none did it here. But maybe we're overestimating that whole "here" thing.

Torre belongs in the Baseball Hall of Fame for what he did with the Yankees. He brought dignity to his office at every turn, whether he was winning, or battling prostate cancer, or bringing his Safe at Home Foundation around the tri-state area. On a personal level, it has been a pleasure covering him and dealing with him.

Yet no one's job lasts forever, and no one job is intended for just one person. Torre deserves a lifetime standing ovation, but not lifetime tenure.



Don Mattingly, left, and Joe Torre in the dugout. (Newsday/Tom Ferrara / October 8, 2007)

Who's next in line?

1. Don Mattingly. An all-time Yankee player and George Steinbrenner's personal favorite, but team's bench coach has never managed at any level.

2. Joe Girardi. A Bronx fan favorite who managed the 2006 Marlins to an overachieving season - but got fired anyway for insubordination.

3. Tony Pena. Energetic, engaging, but is Yankees first-base coach a big enough name and personality for this extremely challenging job?

4. Bobby Valentine. Definitely has a big enough name and personality. Is it too big, given the media demands?

7-year glitch

The Yankees in the playoffs since beating the Mets in the 2000 World Series:

2007. Lost to Indians in first round, 3 games to 1

2006. Lost to Tigers in first round, 3-1

2005. Lost to Angels in first round, 3-2

2004. Lost to Red Sox in ALCS, 4-3

2003. Lost to Marlins in World Series, 4-2

2002. Lost to Angels in first round, 3-1

2001. Lost to Diamondbacks in World Series, 4-3

[There is certainly merit to Mr. Davidoff's column...hence it's appearance here...but I sure have a tough time swallowing this move on an emotional level. - jtf]

Thomas Sowell: Meet My Friend Clarence

http://www.nationalreview.com
October 9, 2007 12:00 AM

A revealing memoir.

It would be hard to think of anyone whose portrayal in the media differs more radically from the reality than that of Justice Clarence Thomas. His recent appearances on 60 Minutes, the Rush Limbaugh program, and other media outlets provide the general public with their first in-depth look at the real Clarence Thomas.

These media appearances are part of the promotion of his riveting new memoir, titled My Grandfather’s Son. Otherwise, Justice Thomas would probably have continued to confine himself to doing his work at the Supreme Court, without worrying about what was being said about him in the media.

In an era when too many judges, including justices of the Supreme Court, seem to be playing to the media gallery — if not writing opinions or leaking information with an eye toward favorable coverage in the press — Justice Thomas’s refusal to play that game tells us a lot about him.

His memoir tells us more. Born in material poverty beyond anything experienced even by people on welfare today, Clarence Thomas was raised with an abundance of discipline and character-building that would pay off in later life.

This was largely the work of his grandfather, who raised him, and whom he now calls “the greatest man I have ever known.” But that was not his view at the time, when he was a child.

His grandfather, however, was not preoccupied — like so many modern parents — with how the children see things. He took his role as a parent to be to see things that children could not see, including challenges that they would encounter in later life.

The metamorphosis of Clarence Thomas went through many phases — from altar boy to seminary student to a campus radical and racial militant, before eventually coming full circle back to the values his grandfather taught him and an understanding of the law and society that he acquired on his own.

One sign of where he was in his radical and militant phase was that, when someone gave him a book of mine to read, he threw it in the trash basket.

But, by the time I first met him, in 1978, he had already reached the same conclusions on his own that I had reached.

Those conclusions were probably more firmly grasped because they were his own, rather than something he read by somebody else.

Clarence Thomas’ own experiences shocked him into a realization that “affirmative action” and other policies being pushed by civil rights organizations and by liberals generally were doing more harm than good, both to blacks and to American society.

In an era when so many people have neither the time nor the patience to examine arguments and evidence, critics have tried to dismiss Clarence Thomas as someone who “sold out” in order to advance himself.

In reality, he was in far worse financial condition than if he had taken the opposite positions on political issues.

As late as the time of his nomination to the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas’s net worth — everything he had accumulated over a lifetime — was less than various civil-rights “leaders” make in one year.

Nobody sells out to the lowest bidder.

The other great myth about Justice Thomas is that he is a lonely and embittered man, withdrawn from the world, as a result of the brutal confirmation hearings he went through back in 1991.

Clarence Thomas was never a social butterfly. You didn’t see his name in the society pages or at media events, either before he got on the High Court or afterward.

In reality, Justice Thomas has been all over the place, giving talks, especially to young people, and inviting some of them to his offices at the Supreme Court.

Summers find him driving his own bus all around the country, mixing with people at truck stops, trailer parks, and mall parking lots. The fact that he is not out grandstanding for the media does not mean that he is hunkering down in his cellar.

Clarence Thomas’s sense of humor is terrific. Whenever I am on the phone with someone and laughing repeatedly, my wife usually asks me afterward, “Was that Clarence?” It usually is.

Now, thanks to his book, the public can get to know the man himself, rather than the cardboard image created by the media.

© 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Hillary Clinton, Socialist Still


October 9, 2007 6:00 AM

Left-wing blonde ambition.

By Deroy Murdock

http://www.nationalreview.com/


With her intimidating lead in the polls, Senator Hillary Clinton’s presidential bid looks increasingly unstoppable. This may have emboldened the New York Democrat to stop masquerading as a moderate and instead flaunt her full-throated, left-wing radicalism.

With a September 27-30 ABC News/Washington Post poll showing her eclipsing Senator Barack Obama (D., Ill.) 53 percent to his 20, the ever-calculating Clinton now may feel free to peddle higher-octane liberalism.

Consider her pitch to a September 28 Congressional Black Caucus symposium.

“I like the idea of giving every baby born in America a $5,000 account that will grow over time, so that when that young person turns 18 if they [sic] have finished high school they will be able to access it to go to college or maybe they will be able to make that downpayment on their first home.” She added that “we want to make an investment in America’s young people.”

CBC member Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D., Ohio), gushed to the Associated Press’ Devlin Barrett: “Every child born in the United States today owes $27,000 on the national debt. Why not let them come get $5,000 to grow until they’re 18?”

Jones inadvertently pinpoints Clinton’s lunacy. To escape a hole, first stop digging. Given roughly 4 million annual births, Clinton’s proposal would cost taxpayers some $20 billion each year.

In 1972, then-Senator George McGovern similarly offered every American a $1,000 “Demogrant.” Rather than be bribed with their own money, voters overwhelmingly re-elected the South Dakota Democrat’s opponent, Richard Milhous Nixon.

Now, Clinton has resurrected McGovern’s Vietnam-era brainstorm and retooled it for the ’00s. Today, it’s for — all together now — “the children.” She also inflated McGovern’s concept, almost perfectly. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ on-line inflation calculator indicates that $1,000 in 1972 now equals $4,974.09. At least concerning “the children,” Clinton is 100.52 percent for George McGovern’s promise.

GOP contender Rudolph W. Giuliani excoriated Team Clinton’s idea. On Sean Hannity’s radio program, Giuliani said it is “based on pandering to the point where I think they think the American people are stupid.”

Clinton’s Swedish-style idea lacks affluence testing. Every infant would score a $5,000 baby bond — from East L.A. to East Hampton. Fittingly, Clinton has said: “I am a fan of a lot of the social policies that you find in Europe.”

Clinton’s SCHIP reform also would air-raid cash on Americans as if from B-52s. While senators extended the State Children’s Health Insurance Program to families of four earning thrice the poverty line ($61,950), she advocated eligibility at quadruple that threshold — a scandalous $82,600.

It now transpires that an SCHIP concept was among Clinton’s fallbacks if HillaryCare crashed, which it stunningly did. Tuesday’s Politico.com revealed a 1993 memo in which White House staffers outlined “Kids First.”

“This proposal phases in universal coverage,” the draft states. “Under this approach, health care reform is phased in by population, beginning with children.”

Clinton’s spend-o-rama accelerated with her latest government-medicine scheme unveiled September 17. This mandate-rich program would cost taxpayers $110 billion annually.

Indeed, the National Taxpayers Union reports that during the 109th Congress, Clinton proposed $170.8 billion in net expenditure hikes. She is the Senate’s seventh biggest spender, far behind outlay champ Ted Kennedy’s (D., Mass.) $813.7 billion, but comfortably ahead of gravy boats like Barbara Boxer (D., Calif.) at $152.6 billion and majority leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) at $119.2 billion.

Clinton, however, was the Senate’s second busiest spender. While sponsoring just five spending cuts, she offered 190 spending-hike bills, just shy of Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin’s 193 increases. Among the Duchess of Chappaqua’s big ideas:

$15 million for the University of Hawaii’s Henry Kuualoha Giugni Kuopuna Memorial Archives.

$100 million for an Agriculture Department Office of Rural Broadband Initiatives.

$3.47 billion to continue the Spark M. Matsunaga Hydrogen Research, Development, and Demonstration Act of 1990.

A $19.11 billion national innovation initiative.

$40 billion for a new Office of Personnel Management health program for non-federal employees.

Clinton spurned Senator John Cornyn’s affirmation that America’s Iraq commander, General David Petraeus, “deserves the full support of the Senate and strongly condemn[s] personal attacks on the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all members of the United States Armed Forces.” The Texas Republican’s amendment rebuffed the notorious “General Petraeus or General Betray Us” ad MoveOn.org purchased at the New York Times’ apparently illegal discount price.

Cornyn’s measure passed September 20, 72-25, with ample Democratic support. However, Clinton broke Left of such liberal stalwarts as California’s Dianne Feinstein, Vermont’s Patrick Leahy, and Maryland’s Barbara Mikulski, all of whom backed Petraeus and America’s troops. Clinton showed them the back of her hand.

The ever-cautious Clinton occasionally exposes her true ideological core. “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good,” she told San Franciscans in June 2004. As First Lady, she said: “We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.”

Hillary Clinton is a hardened socialist, despite the mainstream media’s efforts to portray her as a “centrist” merely because she is not as over-a-cliff-Left as Michael Moore or MoveOn.org’s patron, George Soros. Worse, her ethical corner-cutting routinely attracts dodgy, cash-rich rogues like recently captured fugitive fundraiser Norman Hsu and Keith Raniere. As the October 1 New York Post explained, Raniere is an alleged pyramid-scam operator who now runs NXVIM — a reputed, Albany-based cult whose members last spring gave Clinton’s campaign $29,900.

With their worst possible nightmare lurking around the corner, Republicans urgently must coalesce around the GOP contender best prepared to shear Hillary Clinton’s blonde ambition.

— Deroy Murdock is a New York-based columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a Media Fellow with the Hoover Institution.

Ayaan Hirsi Ali: abandoned to fanatics

The outspoken former Dutch legislator deserves the protection her country promised before she ran for parliament.

By Sam Harris and Salman Rushdie
Los Angeles Times
October 9, 2007



Ayaan Hirsi Ali (R) in a scene from the film "Submission"

As you read this, Ayaan Hirsi Ali sits in a safe house with armed men guarding her door. She is one of the most poised, intelligent and compassionate advocates of freedom of speech and conscience alive today, and for this she is despised in Muslim communities throughout the world. The details of her story bear repeating, as they illustrate how poorly equipped we are to deal with the threat of Muslim extremism in the West.

Hirsi Ali first fled to the Netherlands as a refugee from Somalia in 1992 after declining to submit to a forced marriage to a man she did not know. Once there, in hiding from her family, she began working as a cleaning lady. But this cleaning lady spoke Somali, Arabic, Amharic, Swahili, English and was quickly learning Dutch, so she soon found work as a translator for other Somali refugees, many of whom, like herself, were casualties of Islam. These women had been abused, mutilated, denied medical care and proper educations and forced into lives of sexual subjection and compulsory childbearing.

After attending the University of Leiden, Hirsi Ali began speaking publicly about the repression of women under Islam, and shortly thereafter she started receiving death threats from local Muslims. Her security situation eventually became so dire that she moved to the U.S. in 2002. However, she was soon contacted by Gerrit Zalm, then deputy prime minister of the Netherlands, who urged her to run for parliament. When Hirsi Ali voiced her security concerns, Zalm assured her that she would be given diplomatic protection wherever and whenever she needed it. She returned to the Netherlands with this assurance, won a seat in parliament and became a tireless advocate for women, for civil society and for reason.

The rest of her story is well known. In 2004, Hirsi Ali collaborated with Theo van Gogh on the film "Submission," which examined the link between Islamic law and the suffering of millions of women under Islam. The reaction from the Muslim community was nothing short of psychopathic, and it confirmed the necessity of Hirsi Ali's work and the reasonableness of her fears. Van Gogh, having declined bodyguards of his own, was gunned down and nearly decapitated on an Amsterdam street, and a letter threatening Hirsi Ali was staked to his chest with a butcher knife.

Hirsi Ali was immediately forced into hiding and moved from safe house to safe house, sometimes more than once a day, for months. Eventually, her security concerns drove her from the Netherlands altogether. She returned to the U.S., and the Dutch government has been paying for her protection here -- that is, until it suddenly announced last week that it would no longer protect her outside the Netherlands, thereby advertising her vulnerability to the world.

Hirsi Ali may be the first refugee from Western Europe since the Holocaust. As such, she is a unique and indispensable witness to both the strength and weakness of the West: to the splendor of open society and to the boundless energy of its antagonists. She knows the challenges we face in our struggle to contain the misogyny and religious fanaticism of the Muslim world, and she lives with the consequences of our failure each day. There is no one in a better position to remind us that tolerance of intolerance is cowardice.

Having recapitulated the Enlightenment for herself in a few short years, Hirsi Ali has surveyed every inch of the path leading out of the moral and intellectual wasteland that is traditional Islam. She has written two luminous books describing her journey, the most recent of which, "Infidel," has been an international bestseller for months. It is difficult to exaggerate her courage. As Christopher Caldwell wrote in the New York Times, "Voltaire did not risk, with his every utterance, making a billion enemies who recognized his face and could, via the Internet, share information instantaneously with people who aspired to assassinate him."

The Dutch Parliament will be debating Hirsi Ali's case this week. As it stands, the government's decision to protect her only within the borders of the Netherlands is genuinely perverse. While the Dutch have complained about the cost of protecting Hirsi Ali in the United States, it is actually far more expensive for them to protect her in the Netherlands, as the risk to her is greatest there.

There is also the matter of broken promises: Hirsi Ali was persuaded to run for parliament and to become the world's most visible and imperiled spokeswoman for the rights of Muslim women, on the understanding that she would be provided security for as long as she needed it. Zalm, in his capacity as both the deputy prime minister and the minister of finance, promised her such security without qualification. Most shamefully, Jan Peter Balkenende, the Dutch prime minister, has recommended that Hirsi Ali simply quit the Netherlands and has refused to grant her even a week's protection outside the country, during which she might raise funds to hire security of her own. Is this a craven attempt to placate local Muslim fanatics? A warning to other Dutch dissidents not to stir up trouble by speaking too frankly about Islam? Or just pure thoughtlessness?

The Dutch government should recognize a scandal in the making and rediscover its obligation to provide Hirsi Ali with the protection she was promised.

There is not a person alive more deserving of the freedoms of speech and conscience we take for granted in the West, nor is there anyone making a more courageous effort to defend them.


Sam Harris is the author of "The End of Faith" and "Letter to a Christian Nation." Salman Rushdie is a novelist whose works include "Midnight's Children," which won the Booker Prize, and "The Satanic Verses."

Mike Lupica: No more magic left at Stadium for Yanks, Joe Torre




He had taken this walk so many times before, out the back door of his office at Yankee Stadium, past a utility closet, then down the famous blue line painted into the concrete floor down here, the blue line that leads you to the Yankee clubhouse when you are coming from the other direction. But now Joe Torre was taking this long walk the other way, a bottle of water in his hands, Yankees PR man Jason Zillo in front of him, the longest walk Torre had taken in all his Yankee Octobers, maybe the last one he would ever take as the Yankee manager.

Another Yankee season had ended in the first round, for the third year in a row. It had ended 6-4 for the Indians in Game 4; ended in the glove of Cleveland catcher Kelly Shoppach, ended after a heart attack of a relief pitcher from Cleveland named Joe Borowski had somehow managed to get three outs against the Yankees in the bottom of the ninth of an October baseball game, once the hardest three outs in this world to get.

Just no more. And maybe never again for Joe Torre as Yankee manager.

Bobby Abreu had given the people left at Yankee Stadium, and there were a lot of them still left as the game tried to get to midnight, one last jolt and one last thrill with one out in the ninth, hitting the last Yankee home run of the baseball season. That one brought the Yankees to within two runs. And Alex Rodriguez, who had finally hit a home run in the postseason, hit one for the first time in a very long time, came to the plate. And he brought hope with him.

But then A-Rod flew out to right. That left it up to Jorge Posada, the catcher who had the season of his life as the Yankees were coming from 14 games behind and trying to catch the Boston Red Sox. Posada then struck out. The ball was in Shoppach's glove and the Indians were running from everywhere for Borowski, the way Torre's Yankees used to run for Mo Rivera after he got the last out of the big game.

Posada had made the last out in October before, in the last game of the 2003 World Series against the Marlins. And that night Torre took this exact same walk along the blue line, into the interview room, another class appearance in there, after about a hundred of them as the Yankee manager, in the years when he was winning four World Series and losing two others and always making the playoffs. That night he went looking for the Marlins manager, Jack McKeon, when he was done. Walked that line a little more.

"I know how hard it is to do this," Joe Torre said. I remember him smiling that night and saying, "I never thought it was easy."

The owner of the team, George Steinbrenner, says that Torre will be fired now that the Yankees can't make it out of the first round. He said it big and loud the Saturday the Yankees lost to the Tigers in Detroit last year, and was ready to bang Torre right out of the job then before Brian Cashman, the Yankees general manager, talked him out of it. And when he didn't fire Torre then, didn't fire him after first-round losses to the Angels in '05 and the Tigers and the worst loss in the history of the Yankees - losing the 2004 American League Championship Series after being ahead three games to none - you thought that Torre's destiny was no longer tied into how his team did once it made the playoffs.

Now the old man says it is. Who knows if he meant it? Who knows what he does or doesn't mean at the age of 77, after so few public appearances in the last year that you can count them on one hand? But if this was the last night of Joe Torre's managerial career, a career that goes in with the greatest in the history of the greatest team in baseball history, in there with Miller Huggins and Joe McCarthy and Casey Stengel, he went out with grace last night, even if his team did not.
As soon as he got into the interview room, before he got asked a question, he remembered to congratulate the other manager, a young guy named Eric Wedge.

"I want to congratulate Eric for the way he brought his team back," Torre said. "You make a mistake against them and they beat your brains out."

They did that to Chien-Ming Wang, Torre's starter, and Mike Mussina, who came in because Wang couldn't even get an out in the second inning. It was 6-1 after the top of the fourth, and even though the Yankees got a run here and a run there and finally got to 6-4 in the ninth, they could not come all the way back against the Indians in this game or in this series, the way they couldn't quite finish the job against the Red Sox.

And now it was over and it seems to be over unless there is another reprieve from Steinbrenner and Joe Torre was summing up everything that happened here during the years when he did not just make the Yankees winners again, but made them classy again.

"They were 12 years that felt 10 minutes long," Torre said.

A few minutes later he said, "You think it's going to last forever."

Once you thought Torre's Yankees were going to win forever. No more. Indians 6, Yankees 4.
The door to the interview room opened, Torre walked through it, back along that line. There had been other long walks for him at Yankee Stadium. Never one like this.

Monday, October 08, 2007

Robert Spencer: Islam is Peace for Britain?

http://www.humanevents.com/

Posted: 10/08/2007

Anjem Chaudary

“Who are we? We are Islam is peace. We want to eradicate Islamophobia. Our home is Britain. And we represent peace.”

It’s a new ad campaign in Britain: Islam is Peace. Buses and trains are sporting the legend, “Islam is Peace,” and an array of images, including that of a Muslim policewoman, a Muslim scout group, and a Muslim chef, attempt to show that Muslims in Britain are ordinary citizens, and should not be regarded with suspicion.

The group’s website derides as a “misconception” the idea that “jihad means holy war.” It speaks about jihad as involving a “struggle to improve the quality of life in society and the struggle against injustice, oppression and tyranny,” but says nothing about armed struggle. It leaves unexplained how innumerable thousands of Muslims worldwide could have gotten the idea that jihad had something to do with violence. The site also dismisses the idea that “terrorism is supported in Islam,” saying, “this misconception is one of the most widely held misconceptions about Islam today,” and quoting the Qur’an to show that “it is clearly Islamically unlawful to murder an innocent person.” However, it doesn’t specify what qualifies a person as innocent, and thus does not answer the jihadist claim that no non-Muslim can be innocent.

The British jihadist leader Anjem Chaudary articulated this view several years ago on British television, when he told an incredulous interviewer that “as far as Muslims are concerned, you are innocent if you are a Muslim.”So if you condemn attacks on innocents, you’ve done nothing -- absolutely nothing -- to condemn the actual jihadist point of view. The Islam is Peace campaign centers around a five-point plan:

1. To monitor and fight Islamophobia wherever it occurs.

2. To create permanent channels of dialogue and debate between the Muslim community and the rest of Britain, ensuring that your voice is always in the mainstream media. To partner with business and government to ensure that our concerns such as racism and social exclusion are understood.

3. To call upon our government to work towards a just and lasting peace in areas of conflict around the world, helping eliminate the injustices that foment division and nurture violence.

4. To be creative. To ensure that we have our finger on the pulse of the British mainstream. To understand what our community wants the world to hear.

5. To create friendships. To create a culture of understanding. To create a future of dialogue and a lot of new friendships.

Did you have a sense of déjà vu reading those points? They are, not accidentally, quite similar to the goals of the 1960s civil rights movement in America. But the difference between this campaign and a real civil rights campaign is the same as the difference between Rooseveltian reformers and Leninesque revolutionaries.

A few things are glaringly absent from these five points. There is not one word about fighting against the jihadist ideology of Islamic supremacism within English mosques and Islamic schools. Instead, point one of the campaign is to fight against undefined Islamophobia, as if the only reason why anyone regarded Muslims with suspicion was because of bigotry and hatred by non-Muslims.

Well, I’ve got news for you. If “Islamophobia” actually exists at all, it is a result of the over nine thousand violent attacks committed by Muslims in the name of Islam since 9/11. If the Islam is Peace organizers really want to end “Islamophobia,” here is a simple five-point plan of my own.

To end “Islamophobia,” Muslims should:

1. Focus their indignation on Muslims committing violent acts in the name of Islam, not on non-Muslims reporting on those acts.

2. Renounce definitively not just "terrorism," but any intention to replace the U.S. Constitution (or the constitutions of any non-Muslim state) with Sharia even by peaceful means.

3. Teach Muslims the imperative of coexisting peacefully as equals with non-Muslims on an indefinite basis.

4. Begin comprehensive international programs in mosques all over the world to teach against the ideas of violent jihad and Islamic supremacism.

5. Actively work with Western law enforcement officials to identify and apprehend jihadists within Western Muslim communities.

If Muslims do those five things, voila! “Islamophobia” will vanish. No slick PR campaigns will be needed.

Mr. Spencer is director of Jihad Watch and author of "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)" , "The Truth About Muhammad" and "Religion of Peace?" (all from Regnery -- a HUMAN EVENTS sister company).


Reader Comments: ( 4)


Here are a few of the comments submitted by our readers.


Click to view all

Springsteen: Silence Is Unpatriotic

Rock Star Answers Critics Who Say His New Anti-War Album Is Unpatriotic

http://www.cbsnews.com
Oct. 7, 2007



(CBS) It's hard to picture, but Bruce Springsteen turned 58 last month. His breakout hit, "Born to Run," is 32 years old. While rock stars his age are content to tour with their greatest hits, Springsteen launched, last week, what may become his most controversial work as a songwriter.

Even now, Springsteen is an artist in progress, having moved from stories about girls and cars to populist ballads that echo the dust bowl days of Woody Guthrie. Springsteen has put all that together now in his first tour with the E Street Band in four years. As correspondent Scott Pelley reports, he has returned to full-throated rock and roll, and a message that's sharper than ever, damning the war in Iraq, and questioning whether America has lost its way at home.

Springsteen told 60 Minutes his concert is part circus, dance party, political rally, and big tent revival. "You're the shaman, you know? You're the storyteller. You're the magician. The idea is whatever the ticket price, we're supposed to be there to deliver something that can't be paid for. That's our job," Springsteen says.

"You have got to be, wild guess, worth somewhere north of 100 million dollars. Why are you still touring? You don't have to do this," Pelley remarks.

"What else would I do? You got any clues?" Springsteen asks. "Got any suggestions? I mean, am I going to garden? Why would you stop. I mean, you play the music and you know, grown men cry. And women dance. That's why you do it."

"It's good to be a rock star," Pelley says.

"I would say that yes it is," Springsteen says. "But the star thing I can live with. The music I can't live without. And that's how it lays out for me, you know. I got as big an ego and enjoy the attention. My son has a word, he calls it 'Attention Whore.'"

"But you have to be one of those or else why would you be up in front of thousands of people, you know, shaking your butt. But at the same time, when it comes down to it, it's the way it makes you feel. I do it because of the way it makes me feel when I do it. It gives me meaning, it gives me purpose," Springsteen explains.

"Some of the pieces in the new record are gonna be considered controversial. Give me a sense of what you think has to be said. Why are you still writing?" Pelley asks,

"It's how I find out who you are, and who I am, and then who we are. I'm interested in that. I'm interested in what it means to be an American," Springsteen says. "I'm interested in what it means to live in America. I'm interested in the kind of country that we live in and leave our kids. I'm interested in trying to define what that country is. I got the chutzpa or whatever you want to say to believe that if I write a really good about it, it's going to make a difference. It’s going to matter to somebody."



Bruce Springsteen (C) performs with the E Street Band and his wife, Patti Scialfa (R), in Hartford, Connecticut October 2, 2007.

He's coming back to his nearly life-long friends in one of the most successful neighborhood bands ever, the E Street Band, named for the road where they used to rehearse. His wife of 16 years, Patti Scialfa, plays guitar. They have three teenagers back home.

Their reunions start where they first met, in Asbury Park, N.J. For a rock band, it's all very businesslike; rehearsal starts at 9 a.m.

There are more than 250 songs in the Springsteen repertoire. That's what makes rehearsals, like the one Pelley watched, so critical. Before each concert, maybe just an hour before, Springsteen writes by hand the list of songs, and their order. He changes it every night. But at least one song is always there, so familiar to the band that all he has to write on the list is "B-to-R," as in "Born to Run."

E Street keyboardist Roy Bittan and guitarist Steve van Zandt go back with Springsteen more than 30 years.

Do they hate playing "Born to Run" over and over again?

"It's funny you said that because I was watching something on TV. And it was Tony Bennett. And they asked Tony Bennett, 'Aren't you tired of singing I Left My Heart In San Francisco?' And his answer was, 'It gave me the keys to the world,'" Bittan says. "Well there it is, that's it."

"I figure if we do a few more tours I might actually learn it," van Zandt says, laughing. "So, you know. I mean, we live in hope, right?"



Humor helps if you’re an E-Streeter, because in the 1980s, Springsteen walked away from them after more than 15 years together. He wanted to play with other musicians, and sometimes with none at all.

"How was the news broken? Did Bruce tell the band himself? Tell me about it," Pelley says.

"I think Bruce picked up the phone and called everybody. And I think everybody was shocked and, I'm hurt. And just felt really abandoned," Bittan recalls.

"Was that hard? Was it heartbreaking? You say, 'Look, I'm going on. I'm leaving you behind,'" Pelley asks Springsteen.

"Well, I didn't exactly put it like that," Springsteen says, laughing.

Asked how he put it, Springsteen says, laughing, "I soft-soaped it somehow. Or I tried, you know? And, you know, everybody had different feelings. I mean people were mad or angry and suddenly they're okay. I wasn't going to be any good to them at that moment. You know? And I think what happens is sometimes you got to break your own narrative."

"We all have stories we're living and telling ourselves," he says, laughing. "And there's a time when that narrative has to be broken because you've run out of freedom in it. You've run out of places to go."

The split forced the band to find other places to go. Van Zandt joined the mob on "The Sopranos" on HBO, and drummer Max Weinberg joined Conan O’Brien on NBC. But they always drop what they’re doing to return to Springsteen.

60 Minutes watched the band do a small rehearsal out of the new material before an audience of 2,000 or so in Asbury Park. There’s something special about a Springsteen audience: they know the words, and the stories they feel in themselves. This was the day after Bruce’s 58th birthday, and Pelley found him immediately after the show, wringing wet.

"What did you learn about the band tonight?" Pelley asks.

"We made fewer screw ups than I thought we might. The main thing you learn is not so much the band, because the band will just play better from tonight on out. You know? But you learn a lot about the set, you know, you're trying to work your new things in. You're trying to get in what you're trying to say. You're trying to get people just to rock. You know, to go crazy and have fun. It's ultimately sort of supposed to be a bit of an ecstatic experience," Springsteen says.

Was it?

"And we got there a few times. It's pretty good," Springsteen says, laughing. "And so, you're trying to figure out, 'Okay, now how do you take it up to a certain height? And how do you get there?'"

"Pretty good for 58," Pelley remarks.

"Oh. That's nothing. I'm still a chiseled hunk of muscle so…I guess I'll keep going for a while," Springsteen says, laughing.



Bruce Springsteen performs with the E Street Band on NBC's "Today" show in New York, September 28, 2007.

Springsteen's music career began over four decades earlier as a teenager in Freehold, N.J.

"I was probably one of the smartest kids in my class at the time. Except you would've never known it," Springsteen says, laughing. "You would've never known it. Because where my intelligence lay was not, wasn't able to be tapped within that particular system. And I didn't know how to do it myself until music came along and opened me up not just to the world of music but to the world period, you know, to the events of the day. To the connection between culture and society and those were things that riveted me, engaged me in life," Springsteen says. "Gave me a sense of purpose. What I wanted to do. Who I wanted to be. The way that I wanted to do it. What I thought I could accomplish through singing songs."

"It's not just the singing. It's the writing, isn't it, for you?" Pelley asks.

"Of course. Every good writer or filmmaker has something eating at them, right? That they can't quite get off their back . And so your job is to make your audience care about your obsessions," Springsteen says.

His recurring obsession is the life that he knew as a boy, the harsh relationship with his working class dad who didn't think much of a rock and roll son.

"It was a tough, struggling household. People struggled emotionally. People struggled financially to get through the day," Springsteen remembers. "Small town. Small town world which I continue to return to. It's like when I went to write, though, I put my father's clothes on. You know the immersement in that world through my parents and my own experience as a child and the need to tell a story that maybe was partially his. Or maybe a lot his. I just felt drawn to do it."

"Your dad wasn't all that proud of you as a young man?" Pelley asks.

"Oh, he was later. When I came home with the Oscar and I put it on the kitchen table, and he just looked at it and said, 'Bruce, I'll never tell anybody what to do ever again,'" Springsteen remembers, laughing. "It was like, that was his comment. So I said, 'Oh. That's okay.'"

The music that emerged from his upbringing was a kind of blue collar ballad set to rock and roll, Elvis meets Dylan, uniquely Springsteen. Much of the new music is a protest. Some of it blunt, as in the song that asks "Who will be the last to die for a mistake," but most of it subtle, like "Long Walk Home," the story of a man who returns to his all-American small town but doesn’t recognize it anymore.

"What's on your mind? What are you writing about?" Pelley asks.

"I guess I would say that what I do is I try to chart the distance between American ideals and American reality. That's how my music is laid out. It's like we've reached a point where it seems that we're so intent on protecting ourselves that we're willing to destroy the best parts of ourselves to do so," Springsteen says.

Asked what he means, Springsteen tells Pelley, "Well, I think that we've seen things happen over the past six years that I don't think anybody ever thought they'd ever see in the United States. When people think of the American identity, they don't think of torture. They don't think of illegal wiretapping. They don't think of voter suppression. They don't think of no habeas corpus. No right to a lawyer … you know. Those are things that are anti-American."

"You know, I think this record is going to be seen as anti-war. And you know there are people watching this interview who are going to say to themselves, 'Bruce Springsteen is no patriot,'" Pelley remarks.

"Well, that's just the language of the day, you know? The modus operandi for anybody who doesn't like somebody, you know, criticizing where we've been or where we're goin'," Springsteen says. "It's unpatriotic at any given moment to sit back and let things pass that are damaging to some place that you love so dearly. And that has given me so much. And that I believe in, I still feel and see us as a beacon of hope and possibility."

Springsteen sees himself following a long American tradition reaching back through Vietnam and on to the Great Depression.

"There's a part of the singer going way back in American history that is of course the canary in the coalmine. When it gets dark, you're supposed to be singing. It's dark right now," Springsteen says. "And so I went back to Woody Guthrie and Dylan and the people who said, say take Pete Seeger, who wants to know, doesn't want to know how this song sounds, he wants to know what's it for."

"What needs to be said, in this country at this moment, in your opinion, what needs to be said?" Pelley asks.

"I think we live in a time when what is true can be made to seem a lie," Springsteen says. "And what is lie can be made to seem true. And I think that the successful manipulation of those things have characterized several of our past elections. That level of hubris and arrogance has got us in the mess that we're in right now. And we're in a mess. But if we subvert, the best things that we're about in the name of protecting our freedoms, if we remove them, then who are we becoming, you know? Who are we, you know? The American idea is a beautiful idea. It needs to be preserved, served, protected and sung out. Sung out."

Magic...in South Philadelphia


Bruce Springsteen performs alongside Little Steven Van Zandt of the E Street Band at the Wachovia Center in Philadelphia Friday Oct. 5, 2007.

« Magic ...in South Philadelphia Main

Bruce, Part II

Second Springsteen show at the Wachovia Center: better than the first. (A review of which is here.) Looser, smoother, more effortless. Not as rocked-out so much by the Boss' force of will as the natural momentum of the music. I heard a few complaints about the murky, too-loud sound mix after Friday's show, and it was boomy and abrasive where I sat on the left side of the stage the first night, but much better towards the back on Saturday.

Other assorted observations, from a second look. I liked the pairing of "Livin' In the Future" and "Promised Land": One about broken promises, the other about a stubborn belief that you can keep them, at least the ones you make to yourself. The introduction to "Livin'," which is Springsteen's main political speech of the night, however, weighs the song down with more baggage than it can hold. Is that jaunty, "10 Ave. Freeze Out"-ish number really about "rendition ... illegal wiretapping .. attack on our civil liberties" and "the things that are happening in the last six years" that is, under the Bush administration since Sept. 11 - "that aren't supposed to happen here"? Maybe to Bruce it is, but it seems to me he 's weighing it down with more political baggage than the song can hold. More to the point is the pithy line from "Last To Die," about the death toll in Iraq: "We don't measure the blood we've drawn anymore/We just stack the bodies outside the door."

The full band Little Walter-style roadhouse blues "Reason to Believe" is excellent, a nicely filled out and opened up version of the song that he did as an intentionally distorted foot stomp to start the Devils & Dust shows. Great Nils Lofgren slide playing, as well as Miami Steve's "Brian Jones teardrop guitar," as Stones authority Tom Sheehy put it...

All of the set list changes from the first night worked, with a surging "Night" as the opener, before "Radio Nowhere"; "Prove It All Night" in place of "No Surrender"; and "The Ties That Bind" instead of "Candy's Room." And the middle of the set got considerably juiced when, after Springsteen sang a duet with his wife Patti Scialfa on "Town Called Heartbreak," a tune from her Play It As It Lays that's got some 'Retha "Chain of Fools" energy, he gave it up for the old fans with a superb "Incident on 57th Street," one of his greatest, most sadly beautiful story songs, and, I must say, always my favorite from The Wild, the Innocent and the E Street Shuffle. Give me an "Incident" this good, and I'll be just fine without "Rosalita." And that was followed by a ripping "Cadillac Ranch," during which Springsteen seemed to catch Steve Van Zandt unawares when he shouted out "Steve! Guitar solo!"

As for the encores, they were the same as the previous night, except for "Dancing In The Dark" replacing "Waitin' On A Sunny Day." "Thundercrack" was a goofy, good time, as always, but it's strange to me how it's attained such a mythic quality in the Springsteen catalog. I guess it's because it was never released around the time of it's conception, so it has a romantic allure. It was nice, though, that he gave a shout out to the Main Point in Bryn Mawr, though he nipped the cheers by chortling to himself "it didn't fit that many people, you couldn't have been there ..."

"American Land," it seems, is the Magic tour show closer, this year's "Land of Hope and Dreams." It's a song that represents a big, inclusive idea of America where there's room for everybody - "The Blacks, the Irish, the Italians, the Germans and the Jews/The Puerto Ricans, illegals, the Asians, Arabs miles from home" all of whom "come across the water with a fire down below." It sounds like the Pogues, and if anybody that isn't too bummed he didn't play "Thunder Road" wants to seek it out, it's a Springsteen original on the Live in Dublin CD from last year's tour with the Seeger Sessions Band.


Here's the set list:

Night
Radio Nowhere
Prove It All Night
Gypsy Biker
Magic
Reason to Believe
The Ties That Bind
She's the One
Livin' in the Future
The Promised Land
Town Called Heartbreak
Incident on 57th Street
Cadillac Ranch
Devil's Arcade
The Rising
Last to Die
Long Walk Home
Badlands

Girls in Their Summer Clothes
Thundercrack
Born to Run
Dancing In The Dark
American Land

Posted by Dan DeLuca on October 6, 2007 11:58 PM

Dan Deluca is the music critic for the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Anne Applebaum: A Dutch Retreat on Speech?

Anne Applebaum
Washington Post
Monday, October 8, 2007; Page A17
Ayaan Hirsi Ali

And now we come to what may be a truly fundamental test, maybe even a turning point, for that part of the world generally known as the West.

The test is this: Are prominent, articulate critics of radical Islam, critics who happen to be citizens of European countries or the United States, entitled to the same free speech rights enjoyed by other citizens of European countries and the United States?

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Legally, of course they are. In practice, they can say what they want -- and then they can be murdered for doing so. That means that Western governments have a special and unusual responsibility to them, as many have long acknowledged. It is no accident that the writer Salman Rushdie, upon whom the Ayatollah Khomeini declared a fatwa on Feb. 14, 1989, is still very much alive. Though the details have not been publicized, it is assumed that Rushdie remains, one way or another, under the protection of the British police and secret services, both in Britain and abroad. This protection is completely uncontroversial -- in June, the queen even gave Rushdie a knighthood-- and as a result the fatwa has not prevented him from speaking, writing, publishing, even divorcing and remarrying several times over the past 18 years.

The case of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Dutch-Somali politician and writer, is different. Hirsi Ali has been under Dutch police protection since 2002, when her public comments about mistreatment of women in the Dutch Muslim community and references to herself as "secular" led to death threats in Holland.

Though encouraged to remain in the country -- and promised security protection -- by the government then in power, the mood in Holland changed in 2004. That year, a fanatic named Mohammed Bouyeri infamously murdered Theo Van Gogh, the director of a film about the oppression of Muslim women -- and then thrust a knife bearing a note threatening Hirsi Ali, who wrote the film's script, into the victim's chest.

Dutch society became, and remains, bitterly divided in the wake of the Van Gogh murder. Some of Hirsi Ali's compatriots decided it was time to address the issues of women, Islam and integration head on. The Dutch writer Leon de Winter, a defender of Hirsi Ali, talks openly about his country's failure to integrate Muslim immigrants, attributing the problem to the Dutch "guilt complex": "As soon as we let people from the Third World come here to work in our rich country, we . . . somehow saw them as sacred victims."

Others simply want Hirsi Ali and her ilk to go away forever, thereby keeping Holland out of the headlines and Amsterdam off terrorists' hit lists. Unlike the British, who have gotten used to the idea that faraway events can affect them, the Dutch, at least in this century, are more insular.
That helps explain why, in 2006, the Dutch government tried to revoke Hirsi Ali's citizenship over an old immigration controversy, and why her neighbors went to court that year to have her evicted from her home (they claimed the security threat posed by her presence impinged upon their human rights). But although she did finally move to the United States, the argument continued in her absence. Last week, the Dutch government abruptly cut off her security funding, forcing her to return briefly to Holland.

The reasons given were financial, but there was clearly more to it. To put it bluntly, many in Holland find her too loud, too public in her condemnation of radical Islam. She doesn't sound conciliatory, in the modern continental fashion. Compare her description of Islam as "brutal, bigoted, fixated on controlling women" with the German judge who, citing the Koran, in January told a Muslim woman trying to obtain a divorce from her violent husband that she should have "expected" her husband to deploy the corporal punishment his religion approves. Hirsi Ali herself says she is often told, in so many words, that she's "brought her problems on herself." Now the Dutch prime minister openly says he wants her to deal with them alone.

Fortunately, Hirsi Ali is already back in the United States, under professional, full-time, well-resourced and for the moment privately organized protection. But this week, the Dutch parliament is due to debate her status once again. And once again, the Dutch will be confronted with the facts that Hirsi Ali remains a Dutch citizen; that the threat to her life comes at least in part from groups based in Holland; that she lives abroad because the Dutch political situation forced her to; and that when she speaks out, she does so in defense of what she believes to be Dutch values.

Whether or not the Dutch like it -- and I'm sure most of them don't -- revoking her police protection will send a clear message to the world: that the Dutch are no longer willing to protect their own traditions of free speech. Resources will be found, and she will recover. But will Holland?

Bill Madden: Joe Torre lives to fight another night

New York Daily News
Monday, October 8th 2007, 4:00 AM


The Yankees bought themselves and Joe Torre a stay of execution last night, even though Roger Clemens, in what was probably the last start of his career, was anything but a savior.

They get to play another day and Torre gets to manage another day because Jake Westbrook wasn't Fausto Carmona or C.C. Sabathia, and 21-year-old Phil Hughes wasn't Clemens. They play on because the Cleveland Indians, after staking out a three-run lead with runs in the first three innings, wilted amid the sudden awakening of Yankee bats and the din of the rejuvenated Stadium crowd in an 8-4 Bombers win.

Heaven knows, the Yankees came into the game with a whole lot of pressure and bad karma going against them, including, of course, George Steinbrenner's publicized proclamation that Torre's job was "on the line" if they suffered the ignominy of a third straight first-round kayo. And in that regard, they were 2-6 when facing elimination starting with losing Game 7 of the 2001 World Series to the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Now, at least, they're 3-6 and still kicking.

Certainly, Torre knew it was a lot to expect the 45-year-old Clemens, who hadn't pitched in 22 days because of a strained left hamstring, fulfilling his savior expectations, and sure enough, 59 pitches into the game, Clemens was history. Literally. It is unrealistic to expect the Rocket to try to pitch any more on his fragile, aged legs and, in a bittersweet sort of way, it's time the Yankees stopped relying on old pitchers to stabilize their rotation, and get on with the future.

And last night that future was Hughes, the rookie righthander 24 years Clemens' junior, who came on in relief when the old warhorse limped off the mound with one on and one out in the third and pitched the Yankees into the seventh and to Joba Chamberlain without bugs. After yielding a two-out double to Jhonny Peralta that made the score 3-0 in the third, Hughes was touched for only one other hit in his 3-2/3 innings of saving relief, walking none and striking out four.

"He was huge for them," Indians manager Eric Wedge said of Hughes. "He had a live fastball, a tough breaking ball and then he started mixing in changeups. He showed a lot of poise."

"I remember telling (Hughes) in spring training, 'You're not going to start the season for us but there may be some day this year somebody's going to tap you on the shoulder and say it's your turn,'" Torre said. "I certainly didn't envision that as coming out of the bullpen in the division series, but he took it and was very calm for a youngster with the inexperience and all that."

Just as big for Torre were the Yankee batters, who'd hit .121 in the first two games of the series. After continuing to sputter against Westbrook for the first four innings, hitting into three double plays, they finally broke through with a four-run salvo in the fifth, capped by Johnny Damon's three-run homer into the right-field seats. A sinkerball specialist as opposed to power pitchers Carmona and Sabathia, Westbrook had succeeded in getting 11 ground-ball outs in the first four innings before being rocked with one out in the fifth by an opposite-field single by Hideki Matsui, a double into the left-field corner by Robinson Cano, an RBI single to left by Melky Cabrera and then Damon's homer, which got the Stadium crowd of 56,358 really rocking.

"We knew our backs were against the wall and that was a lot on the line tonight," said Damon. "We're playing for a manager we love, hoping to extend the season for as long as we can. We understand as players that Mr. Steinbrenner is the boss and makes the decisions. As players, we've battled through adversity all season and now is another time. I think Joe Torre has meant so much to the Yankee organization and you know we get to play for him another day and hopefully a lot longer."

Whatever thoughts Steinbrenner had about replacing Torre, whatever candidates he might be pondering, they go on hold for at least another day and with a matchup of junkballer Paul Byrd, the Tribe's No.4 starter, and Chien-Ming Wang tonight, it is not unreasonable to think the Yankees can extend this last stand for Torre to Wednesday in Cleveland.

"You work here, you understand the pressure everybody's under to win all the time," Torre said. "The only thing I try to do is allow my players to roll the dice out there and play because every time we go to the postseason, there's nothing that's gonna satisfy anybody unless you win the World Series."

Who knows what's going on in his head right now? Before the game, Torre said: "I'll save all that for later on when I've got nothing else to do here."

For another day, he still has something to do, still has a game to manage, still has a team in the tournament, which is more than Charlie Manuel, Lou Piniella and Mike Scioscia can say. And unlike a year ago when his team, facing another elimination in Detroit, didn't even show up for the final game of the ALDS, last night his hitters found their bats for him and his two kid pitchers, Hughes and Chamberlain, gave him another glimpse of what the future holds around here.

Still, as they say in baseball jargon, it remains "day-to-day" whether that future will include Torre.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

Bob Klapisch: Pressure intensifies on Torre

Bergen County Record

Sunday, October 7, 2007


Joe Torre hangs around the cage during batting practice before Game 2.

If there was any doubt that George Steinbrenner is still in control of the Yankees, and still capable of an '80s-era firing, they were dashed by The Boss' thinly veiled threat directed at Joe Torre. This was the old Boss, all right, targeting the manager and his $7 million annual salary, poised to dismiss Torre if the Yankees get bounced from the playoffs tonight by the Indians.

When Steinbrenner told The Record on Saturday night, "[Torre's] job is on the line," he couldn't have been more direct. Torre has no contract for 2008 and club sources say Steinbrenner has been itching all summer for a reason to hire someone else. A change was almost made in May, when the Yankees fell 14½ games behind the Red Sox, but the Bombers' second-half rebirth forced Steinbrenner and Torre's Tampa-based critics into the background.

But now the Bombers are in crisis, down 0-2 in the AL Division Series and on the brink of yet another first-round exit from the playoffs. If Roger Clemens doesn't win Game 3, Torre will lose whatever equity he had with The Boss. Forget the 12 straight postseason appearances, forget Torre's strong support in the clubhouse or that Torre's Yankees outperformed Willie Randolph's Mets down the stretch.

None of that will matter to Steinbrenner, who is equating Torre's salary with a greater return on his investment. The owner told The Record: "I think we're paying [Torre] a lot of money. He's the highest-paid manager in baseball, so I don't think we'd take him back if we don't win this series."

Needless to say, Torre is counting on Clemens to pitch the game of his life, and not just to save his job. The Yankees are in a state of shock after back-to-back losses at Jacobs Field. The American League's most prestigious offense has been invisible in the past 15 innings, scoring just one run, no match for C.C. Sabathia and Fausto Carmona in Games 1 and 2.

No one symbolizes the Yankees' futility more than Alex Rodriguez. Coming off one of the greatest regular-season performances of the last 50 years, A-Rod hasn't even gotten the ball out of the infield in the ALDS, much less registered a hit. For all the April-through-September momentum A-Rod generated, leading the major leagues in home runs and RBI, he's spiraled downward at the worst possible time.

After going 0-for-4 against Carmona on Friday night, including three strikeouts, the third baseman is now 3-for-38 in the playoffs during the last three years. In his last 15 postseason games, Rodriguez is 4-for-50, and hasn't had an RBI in his last 65 postseason plate appearances.

Torre has rallied to A-Rod's defense, saying, "You can't put it all on him." But the manager knows something's wrong. He called off Saturday's scheduled workout at the Stadium, choosing to let the Yankees rest before resuming the series as the overwhelming underdogs. Torre also is considering shaking up his lineup, specifically replacing the slumping Hideki Matsui with Jason Giambi.

Still, if the Yankees (and Torre) are to keep breathing in October, they'll need A-Rod in a hurry. Everyone senses the urgency, including Doug Mientkiewicz, Rodriguez's closest friend on the team. The first baseman, who was a high school teammate of A-Rod's, spent the day texting his buddy, urging him to relax and arrive at the Stadium today with a fresh perspective.

"I believe in [A-Rod] probably more than anybody else outside of his family," Mientkiewicz told reporters on Saturday. "So I've seen him do it before. He'll do it again. We've just got to keep plugging along and get him in situations to where, you know, they have to come right at him. I said that before, but I believe in him.

"He's going to come through, I promise."

No one can make quite the same guarantee on Torre's behalf. Clearly, Joe knew he was in trouble even before the Yankees set foot in the postseason. During the final week of the regular season, when the Yankees were in Tampa, Torre and The Boss met for a working lunch. The two chatted neutrally about the Bombers' second-half surge, discussed the lineup and otherwise filled in the gaps with corporate small talk.

But not once did Steinbrenner mention Torre's contract, nor did the manager ask for a vote of confidence. Torre walked away from the meal no more certain of his future than when he began the season. Despite the skillful manner in which Torre rescued the Yankees from collapse, Steinbrenner refused to commit to him for 2008 -- prompting one high-ranking executive to say, "Joe's neck is still on the line."

That dark assessment is now a reality. Steinbrenner is planning to be at the Stadium tonight, perhaps thinking his presence will inspire the Yankees. But Torre knows it goes deeper than that. If the Yankees expire prematurely yet again, Steinbrenner wants to see it firsthand, as if to collect enough damning data to make the change he apparently craves.

Who would replace Torre? The guess list includes Joe Girardi and Don Mattingly, for starters. And don't discount Bobby Valentine as a dark horse. Steinbrenner thinks the Yankees have gone soft since 2000 and thinks the answer is a louder, more volatile manager. Valentine, whose contract with the Chiba Lotte Marines is expiring this season, just must tempt The Boss. In this crazy Yankee universe, crazier things have happened.

E-mail: klapisch@northjersey.com