Thursday, September 24, 2015

Why Everything is Bad for You


http://www.nytimes.com/


Ellen Weinstein

When I was growing up in the same New Jersey suburbs so expertly described in Todd Solondz movies and Tom Perrotta novels, the usual lunch for me was a sandwich consisting of Wonder Bread spread thick with Land O’ Lakes butter, a wad of Oscar Mayer bologna and a slice of American cheese.

The beverage was whole milk, Tang or Coke. A stack of salty Pringles rounded off the meal.
Even if I had known back then that people who eat a lot of processed meat tend to die of heart disease or cancer, and that processed cheese is held together by emulsifiers that may lead to kidney problems, and that white bread has almost zero nutritional value, and that soft drinks are sludge, and that Pringles may not qualify as potato chips, I wouldn’t have cared. I had a lot on my mind, what with school and all the playing, and I had yet to develop the fear of death.
But now that I’m an adult who apparently has nothing better to do than bathe in the light of computer screens 16 hours a day, I have plenty of time to scroll through articles eager to convince me that food is killing me.
Like everyone else, I believe every word in those articles. And when my gaze reaches the fifth paragraph, the one that inevitably quotes the university professor who has conducted the latest fear-inducing study, I nod slightly and tell myself that somehow I knew it all along, that I always had a feeling that this meat, or that vegetable, was quickening my demise.
Which is strange because at the same time, I believe that food is keeping me alive.
We’re all going to die. And we all eat food. Therefore, food must be the culprit.
That seems to be the absurd syllogism that lies beneath the surface of many articles in the health, food and science press.
By now we can recite the list. Too much red meat may lead to stroke, cancer and heart disease; until this year, chicken sold in supermarkets may have included arsenic; and even small amounts of pork, when undercooked, can give you trichinellosis, which is no picnic.
Fish that live high on the food chain, the especially delicious ones like king mackerel and tuna, may contain mercury, which leaves us with little choice but to order the squishy creatures at the bottom of the sea, like clams, oysters, mussels, cockles, lobsters, crabs and, don’t forget, those tasty periwinkles.
But while some health advocates are gung-ho about the bivalve shellfish, others remind us that they tend to soak up toxins, viruses and bacteria that may afflict people who eat them with three types of shellfish poisoning. The toxins that cause the poisonings, furthermore, “are not destroyed by cooking,” the Canadian Food Inspection Agency warns.
So there’s that.
Fruits and vegetables in general present a dilemma: the ones that are commercially grown may include pesticides linked to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; the organic variety may be no better, according to a Stanford study that found “little evidence of health benefits” for those with an organic diet.
Like those federal agents who brought down Al Capone on a charge of tax evasion, we are not above indicting certain food items for reasons having nothing to do with the health risks they may pose. Almonds, for example, are packed with protein, but if you imagined that you could eat them without compunction, you are not familiar with an article in The Atlantic,“The Dark Side of Almond Use,” by Dr. James Hamblin.
He reports that a single almond soaks up 1.1 gallons of water before he goes on to argue, quite persuasively, that anyone who eats this tree nut exacerbates the disastrous ecological conditions brought on by the drought in almond-rich California.
Salad eaters are perhaps equally numb to environmental concerns, according to a recent Washington Post article, which makes the case that the lettuce crop takes up too much arable space for the nutrition it delivers.
Even water has become a target. Recent articles point out that drinking eight glasses per day, long thought to be a good idea, is a fool’s game, and that too much water can kill you.
Such stories stick in the mind because of their inherent irony: The very things that provide us with sustenance, they seem to argue, may be out to get us.
I hope you don’t mind the idea of dining on dung beetles, caterpillars and locusts, among other such critters, because that’s what the United Nations recommends in an exhaustive report. We need to get over our aversion to entomophagy, its authors argue, if we are to survive on an overpopulated planet wracked with climate change.
Cooks.com, jumping on the bandwagon, offers a recipe for a protein-rich dish, earthworm chow.
Another foodstuff of sorts now considered less of a problem than, say, meat, is dirt. Actual dirt. Until recently, the practice of eating it was classified as pathological. No more. It turns out that geophagia is widespread, relatively harmless and may protect the body from toxins.
Health-scare stories, even those that are not overblown, draw their special power from the fact that we go through the days denying our mortality. Each one reminds us anew that there’s no way out.
Unable to avoid this tragic and absurd-seeming condition, we lash out against our fates by finding fresh reasons to make a villain out of the one thing that is doing its part to keep us alive: food.
We add salt to the psychic wound when we momentarily trick ourselves into believing that bugs, worms and dirt are the only things fit for human consumption.
I’m not falling for it anymore. I’m going back to bologna and cheese.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Yogi Berra dead at 90: Yankees legend, Baseball Hall of Famer was lovable character, American hero


BY 
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/
September 23. 2015



For the millions of friends and fans of Yogi Berra, beloved American icon, Hall-of-Fame Yankee catcher and unintentional world philosopher, these are the saddest of possible words: It’s over.

Berra, who played on a record 10 Yankee world championship teams and 14 All-Star teams, won three American League Most Valuable Player awards, had two terms as Yankee manager and one with the Mets and coined dozens of goofy-sounding but aptly true sayings termed “Yogi-isms” such as “When you come to the fork in the road, take it” and “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over”, died Wednesday. He was 90.
"We are deeply saddened by the loss of a Yankees legend and American hero, Yogi Berra," the Yankees tweetedearly Wednesday morning. Just four months earlier, Berra had celebrated his 90th birthday.
Even before the “greatest living Yankee” torch was passed to him with the death of Joe DiMaggio in 1999, Berra was always at the top of the list as the most respected and beloved Yankee deity because of his clutch hitting on the field and his humility and genial disposition off it. In Berra’s 18 seasons with the Yankees from 1946-63, they went to the World Series 14 times, winning 10 of them, making him baseball’s all time “Lord of the Rings”.
It was in Game Three of the 1947 Fall Classic against the Dodgers that Berra etched the first line of his lengthy Hall-of-Fame resume when he became the first player in history to have a pinch-hit homer in the World Series. The homer was struck off Ralph Branca (who would go on to yield another far more famous postseason homer to Bobby Thomson in the 1951 Dodgers-Giants playoff game.) Berra and Branca later became lifelong pals and Yogi would often kid him that his homer off him was far more historic than Thomson’s.
In all, the durable Berra, who averaged 140 games caught from 1950-56, hit .285 with 2,150 career hits, 358 homers, 1,175 runs and 1,430 RBI in 19 big league seasons that included a four-game cameo with Mets in 1965, two years after he was fired as Yankee manager for the first time. It was Yankee manager Casey Stengel who referred to Berra as “my assistant manager” during those halcyon years, and the Baseball Writers Association seemed to agree that he was the most integral player on all those championship teams, voting him the MVP in 1951 (when he hit .294 with 27 homers and 88 RBI), 1954 (.307 with 22 homers and 125 RBI) and ’55 (.272 with 27 homers and 108 RBI).
A notorious “bad ball” hitter, the lefty-swinging Berra was regarded as having one of the keenest batting eyes of any player in history – evidenced by the fact that he struck out only 415 times in 7,555 at-bats, a remarkable 1/18.2 ratio for a power hitter.
“I just saw the ball good, maybe better than others,” was Berra’s simple explanation for being able to make contact so often. “I probably gave away a lot of at-bats when there was nobody on base, but when guys were on, that was different. I was different.”
It was upon his retirement in 1963 that the Yankee owners, Dan Topping and Del Webb, tapped him to become manager, replacing Ralph Houk, who was promoted to general manager. But while the Yankees were able to win the 1964 American League pennant by one game over the Chicago White Sox - despite the fact Whitey Ford was felled by a hip injury and sore arm the second half of the season, Mickey Mantle was hobbled by sore knees, shortstop Tony Kubek was hampered by neck and back ailments and the bullpen lacked a dependable closer until Pedro Ramos was acquired in a September trade - the perception was they had underachieved all season and that Berra was too easy on his former teammates.
The incident generally regarded as having sealed Berra’s fate with Topping and Webb was an August 20 bus ride from Comiskey Park in Chicago to O’Hare Field - after the Yankees had suffered a four-game sweep by the White Sox - in which backup shortstop Phil Linz began playing a harmonica. When Berra, sitting in the front row of the bus, ordered Linz to stifle it, the infielder didn’t hear him and, instead, at the urging of teammate Joe Pepitone, began playing it louder. This, in turn, sent Berra into a rage as he charged to the back of the bus, confronting Linz, and knocking the harmonica out of his hand.
“Phil and I never had any problems after that,” Berra said years later. “But Phil did good. He made a lot of money off harmonica commercials and endorsements.”
Even though Ford, the longtime Yankee ace, was kayoed by a blocked artery in his throwing arm in the first game of the ’64 World Series, Berra’s Yankees were able to take the St. Louis Cardinals the full seven games before finally succumbing. By then, however, the wheels were already in motion for his firing by Topping and Webb – ironically his replacement wound up being the man who had just defeated him, Johnny Keane, who decided to quit the Cardinals after learning they, too, in August, had made plans to replace him after the season.
“When (Topping and Webb) called me in, I thought they were going to give me a new contract,” Berra recalled to me in a 2002 interview. “I thought I had done a good job. But at least they told me to my face.”
It was a not-so-subtle reference to the next time he would be fired as Yankee manager – by George Steinbrenner after just 16 games of the 1985 season. That one, in which Steinbrenner had his general manager, Clyde King, perform the deed, resulted in a 14-year estrangement between Berra and the Yankees.
Vowing he’d never again set foot in Yankee Stadium as long as “that guy” owned the team, Berra kept his word until January 5, 1999 when a détente with Steinbrenner was arranged by Suzyn Waldman, WFAN’s Yankee beat reporter at the time, as part of a special show the radio station was doing from Berra’s museum in Montclair, N.J. After convincing Steinbrenner that Berra was ready to forgive him, the Yankee owner flew up from Tampa to personally apologize for the long-ago firing. Prior to going on the air, the two huddled in a private room at the museum for about a half hour, after which they emerged arm-in-arm with the grinning Yogi uttering: “It’s over.”
From there, Berra and Steinbrenner became the best of friends, with the Yankee boss staging a special day in Yogi’s honor, July 18, 1999, in which he presented him a check of $100,000 for the museum. Neither could have imagined the Yankees’ David Cone upstaging both of them that day by pitching a perfect game. At least it was opportune that Don Larsen, author of the only perfect game in World Series history – which Berra caught – also happened to be on hand that day as one of Yogi’s former teammates honoring him. Besides Larsen’s perfect game, Berra also caught both of Allie Reynolds’ no-hitters in 1951, the second of which became especially memorable when he dropped Ted Williams’ pop foul behind the plate that would have been the final out.
Berra always said that was his worst moment in baseball, although he was reprieved moments later when Williams hit another foul pop that he did catch.
Lawrence Peter Berra was born May 12, 1925, the youngest of Italian immigrants Pietro and Paulina’s four sons, and he grew up in the predoninantly Italian “Hill” section of St. Louis where his across-the-street neighbor and lifelong pal was Joe Garagiola. Garagiola would also go on to the major leagues as a catcher before embarking a second, much more successful career as a broadcaster, Today Show host and humorist. “Lawdie” as Berra was called by his childhood pals, quit school at 14 after finishing the eighth grade and worked numerous odd jobs, in a coal yard, driving a Pepsi truck, earning $25 a week which, with exception of $2, all went to his mother to help support the family.
In the summers, Berra and Garagiola played sandlot baseball for the Stockham Post American Legion team. It was during one of their games that Berra was resting between innings, sitting on the side lines with his legs crossed underneath him when another teammate and future major leaguer, Bobby Hofman, exclaimed: “Look at Lawdie over there! He looks like one them yogis!” And thus was born a nickname like no other.
There was a story told byBerra’s late wife, Carmen - whom he met at Stan Musial’s restaurant in St. Louis in 1947 where she was a waitress - in which he sent her an anniversary card and signed it ‘Yogi Berra’. When asked why he would sign his whole name on a card to his wife, Berra said: “I dunno. I guess it was out of habit” - to which Carmen countered: “I was actually glad he did, so I didn’t confuse him with all the other Yogis I know.”
When Berra was 17, a local bird dog scout in St. Louis, Leo Browne, recommended him to Yankees general manager George Weiss, who signed him for $500. Berra’s first minor league assignment was Class B Norfolk in 1943 where he played 111 games, all at catcher, and featured one incredible day in which he drove in 23 runs in a doubleheader.
“When I heard about the 23-RBI day, I figured he had a future,” Carmen once said.
They were married January 26, 1949, after Berra concluded a stint in the Navy in which he took part in the D-Day invasion of Normandy, and they went on to have three sons, Larry, Tim, who played pro football, and Dale, who had an 11-year career in the major leagues, including two seasons with the Yankees.
Upon being discharged from the service, Berra reported to the Yankees’ Triple-A farm team, the Newark Bears in 1946 where he hit .314 with 15 homers and earned a late-season promotion to the Yankees after barely two seasons of minor league apprenticeship. Once he reached the big leagues, however, Berra was anything but a polished catcher and his first couple of seasons he played almost as much in the outfield as he did behind the plate while coming under the tutelage of Bill Dickey, the Hall-of-Fame Yankee catcher who preceeded him. In one of his classic “Yogi-isms”, Berra said frequently: “Dickey learned me all of his experiences.”
Berra would go on to surpass Dickey on all the Yankees’ all-time hitting lists.
After his first firing as Yankee manager after the ‘64 season, he left the organization and rejoined Weiss and Stengel as a player/coach with the crosstown Mets. In the spring of 1972, he was elevated to manager of the Mets when Gil Hodges died suddenly of heart attack. A year later, Berra led the Mets to an improbable National League pennant after winning the eastern division with an 82-79 record. Once again, though, he lost the World Series in seven games, this time to the defending world champion Oakland A’s. In August of 1975, with the Mets mired in fifth place, he was dismissed as manager by team chairman M. Donald Grant and that winter returned to the Yankees as a coach for his old teammate, Billy Martin. All the time he was gone, the Yankees failed to make the postseason, but beginning that ‘76 season, they made three straight trips to the World Series.
Throughout his baseball career and in all the years after as he served as one of the game’s all-time good will ambassadors, Berra became acclaimed world wide for his unintentional pronouncements/words of wisdom. About a popular restaurant in Minneapolis, he said:
“Nobody goes there anymore, it’s too crowded.” In discussing the perils of playing left field in Yankee Stadium with its late-day shadows: “It gets late early out there.” When feted at an awards dinner: “I want to thank you for making this night necessary.” And his general philosophy about life: “You can observe a lot by watching.”
Berra is survived by his three sons, Larry, Tim and Dale, and millions of fans throughout the world who loved him simply for being so genuine.



Tuesday, September 22, 2015

Pope Wrongly Blames Capitalism For Ills Of Poor

BY 

POPE FRANCIS DESECRATES MEMORY OF CATHOLIC MARTYRS IN CUBA

The Castro regime's reward for mass murder.



September 22, 2015


Pope Francis gave mass under a mural of Che Guevara in Cuba’s Revolution Square.Photo: AP


“Dear Mom and Dad,
I’ve just received the news that I’ll be executed by firing squad in the morning. I assure you, dear parents, that I’ve never felt such spiritual tranquility as I do now. I feel content knowing that very shortly I’ll be with God, waiting and praying for you, my parents. I realize this news is painful for you, but please have faith in the Eternal Life. I want you all to rise above this and know that God, in his infinite mercy, has given me the grace to reconcile with Him… Hugs and kisses, not tears, for everyone. Goodbye, my  family. Have faith in God. 
Long Live Christ the King!
 -- Alberto Tapia 
“Apunten!" ("Aim!") yelled the unnerved firing squad leader the following morning April 18, 1961 … 
“Listos!" ("Ready!") 
-- Viva Cristo Rey!” ("Long love Christ the King!)" suddenly yelled Alberto Tapia shortly interrupting the murder process and greatly unnerving the murderers. 
“Fuego!!!”  ("Fire!") finally yelled the furious executioner.
A deafening blast and Soviet bullets ripped apart the head and torso of yet another young Cuban martyr. Albert Tapia was barely 21 years old, typical age for most of Castro and Che’s murder victims.
The defiant yells ("Viva Cristo Rey!" "Viva Cuba Libre!" "Abajo Comunismo!") from the bound and staked martyrs “would make the walls of La Cabana prison tremble!” wrote eyewitness to the slaughter, Armando Valladares, who suffered 22 torture-filled years in Castro’s prisons and was later appointed by Ronald Reagan as U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Commission.
Given their valiant defiance even during their last seconds alive, by mid-1961 the mere binding and blindfolding of Castro and Che’s young murder victims wasn’t enough. The fine folks who hosted Pope Francis’ in Cuba this week then began ordering that the Catholic youths also be gagged. The shaken firing-squads demanded it. The yells were badly unnerving the trigger-pullers, you see.
As the fine folks who hosted Pope Francis in Cuba this week yanked the young Catholic heroes from their cells, bent their arms back, and bound their hands, two more Communist guards came into play. One grabbed the struggling victim’s hair and jerked his head back, trying to steady him. The other taped his mouth shut.
Raul Castro (who hosted the Pope at yesterday’s mass) and Che Guevara (whose visage formed the backdrop for the mass) were the most notorious executioners during the early years of the Cuban Revolution. The orders, of course, all issued from Fidel Castro, with whom Pope Francis went out of his way to visit and smilingly hob-nob after the mass.  
“I am not Christ or a philanthropist,” wrote Che Guevara in a letter to his mother.  “I am all the contrary of a Christ -- In fact, if Christ himself stood in my way, I, like Nietzsche, would not hesitate to squish him like a worm.”
As mentioned: an enormous image of Che Guevara formed the backdrop to Pope Francis’s mass in Havana yesterday. 
Pope Francis and Fidel Castro had a half-hour meeting in Havana on Sunday at the former Cuban leader's home. The Vatican described the meeting at Castro's residence as informal and familial, with an exchange of books and discussion about big issues facing humanity, including Francis' recent encyclical on the environment and the global economic system
Pope Francis and Fidel Castro had a half-hour meeting in Havana on Sunday at the former Cuban leader's home. The Vatican described the meeting at Castro's residence as informal and familial, with an exchange of books and discussion about big issues facing humanity, including Francis' recent encyclical on the environment and the global economic system.
Picture: Alex Castro/AIN
Castro’s KGB and STASI-tutored regime prepared for the Pope’s visit carefully. Any unsightly protests would obviously mar the occasion, especially for a regime long-accustomed to preening in front of the international media mirror. So Cuban dissidents (especially Catholic ones) were rounded up, often brutally, as captured in this video. 
"The facts and figures are irrefutable. No one will any longer be able to claim ignorance or uncertainty about the criminal nature of Communism," wrote the New York Times (no less!) about "The Black Book of Communism."
This study found that Castro and Guevara’s firing squads murdered upwards of 16,000 Cubans, the equivalent, given the U.S. population, of almost one million executions. Some more perspective: the UN (the same United Nations that proudly features Cuba on its Human Rights Council, by the way) charged former Serbian dictator Slodoban Milosevic with “genocide” for ordering 8000 executions.
And far from any of the repentance the Catholic Church supposedly requires for forgiveness, the Castro brothers have always doubled- and even tripled-down on their gloating for those thousands of murders, historically denouncing the young victims as “CIA mercenaries” and “terrorists.”
None of this has prevented the Castro regime from receiving the most papal visits recently of any Latin America nation, equaling the number of papal visits to Brazil, with a population of 200 million, 130 million of them declared Catholics. In contrast, Cuba has a population of 11 million, only a tiny fraction of which are practicing Catholics. Someone’s got some serious “‘splainin'” to do for this papal fetish of constantly visiting Stalinist Cuba and chumming around with her Stalinist rulers. 
Interestingly, more Popes (three) have recently visited Cuba -- a nation with many more crypto-voodooists than Catholics -- than have visited Mexico (with 97 million Catholics). Hello? And as Joan Rivers used to ask: “Can we talk?” (about this glaring and –for many—disgusting incongruity.)
For many of us, the Papal motivation for visiting Cuba seems no different from Beyonce’s, Conan O’Brien’s, Jack Nicholson’s, Oliver Stone’s, Sean Penn’s, etc. The Popes get plenty of press and get to poke Uncle Sam in the eye. In this respect, they seem no different from all those loud-mouthed, Castro-hugging celebrity popinjays.

Monday, September 21, 2015

Keep Your Eyes on the Race: Carly Fiorina's Prepared to Fight


By Debra Saunders - September 20, 2015

Republican presidential candidate and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina speaks during the second official Republican presidential candidates debate of the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, California, United States, September 16, 2015. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
Republican presidential candidate and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina speaks during the second official Republican presidential candidates debate of the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley (Thomson/Reuters)

SIMI VALLEY, Calif. -- Who is this Carly Fiorina? In the press filing center at the CNN Republican debate, journalists from around the country were asking reporter Carla Marinucci and me because we covered the former Hewlett-Packard CEO for the San Francisco Chronicle in 2010 when she ran for the U.S. Senate against California Democrat Barbara Boxer -- and failed spectacularly by 1 million votes. Yet here she is, winning the first two GOP primary debates and burning past veteran politicians who have won brutal elections in big states. Can she actually win? And what's her special sauce?
Fiorina rose "from secretary to CEO," as she likes to put it, because she never stopped pushing herself. When she became the first woman to head a Fortune 20 company in 1999, she wrote in her memoirs, "Tough Choices," she wanted to push what she saw as a moribund corporate entity into a company with a "hardnosed focus on merit, excellence and performance." She was controversial. She pushed for a merger with Compaq, which led to the elimination of many jobs. She laid off 30,000 workers and outsourced jobs.
Fiorina was famously fired in 2004. After a contentious "boardroom brawl," she walked away with a golden parachute of $19 million in cash and $21 million in stock and pension benefits.
She turned her eyes toward politics. When Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., ran for president in 2008, Fiorina stumped furiously for him -- which led to conjecture that she would be McCain's choice as running mate. That honor went to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. After the GOP bloodbath, Fiorina decided to run for Boxer's seat.
Fiorina was a natural candidate. As observers saw Wednesday night, she has a true gift with language. She should; she reads Greek and Latin. But she doesn't talk like a university professor or a Beltway wonk: "I'll tell you why people are supporting outsiders. ... If someone's been in the system their whole life, they don't know how broken the system is."
She dispatched Donald Trump when she said: "I also think that one of the benefits of a presidential campaign is the character and capability, judgment and temperament of every single one of us is revealed, over time and under pressure. All of us will be revealed over time and under pressure."
Fiorina hit President Barack Obama for not getting a big immigration bill through in his first two years in office, when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress. "The Democrats don't want this issue solved." She knows how to use simple language to make her point.
When asked about Trump's claim that he was not criticizing her looks in a recent Rolling Stone interview, she replied, "I think women all over this country heard very clearly what Mr. Trump said."
In 2010, Fiorina was a terrific candidate, far better than former eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who ran for governor of California -- also as a Republican and also as a first-time candidate. Whitman lost big to the famously frugal Jerry Brown. The GOP candidate famously poured millions -- including $140 million of her own money -- into her campaign in an orgy of advertising and self-promotion, while she gave precious little access to the media. It was never clear why Whitman wanted to be governor.
Fiorina came off better in contrast with Whitman. She spent a fraction of Whitman's campaign chest -- $22 million, which was less than Boxer spent. She readily talked to the media. She came across as a game candidate with nothing to hide.
I thought Fiorina would fare far better than Whitman in the general election. But though the former HP CEO garnered more votes than the former eBay chief, it was a difference of fewer than 100,000 votes. For political scientists, there's an important lesson. A great campaign with a strong candidate can make a difference of maybe 2 percent. But party trumps all. It's nearly impossible to get a Republican -- at least a Republican who opposes abortion rights -- elected to statewide office in California.
Fiorina shares a vulnerability with 2012 GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney. Democrats were able to pummel Romney for layoffs that often followed his Bain Capital's decision to invest in a corporation. Romney didn't help himself when he talked up "creative destruction" and told an audience, "I like being able to fire people who provide services to me." Democrats were able to paint Romney as the symbol for ruthless cost-cutting capitalism. If she is the nominee or running mate, a small army of disgruntled former HP workers would be happy to tell their bitter tales. So why would the GOP want to put a distaff Romney on the 2016 ticket?
The difference, some Republican fans tell me, is Fiorina's skill at biting back. When CNN debate moderator Jake Tapper asked Fiorina about Trump's assertion that Fiorina "ran HP into the ground," she did not flinch. She described what the economy was like when she took the helm. She did not regret her "tough choices," because tough cookies (my phrase) make enemies. Then Fiorina pulled out a card few can draw. When HP fired her, she said, Steve Jobs called to say, "Hey, been there, done that twice."
The golden parachute? Hey, why can't a woman bring home an obscene parting haul the way so many men have?
In December, I found Fiorina less available than in 2010. I noted that Fiorina had failed to pay off $500,000 in debt from her 2010 senatorial campaign. Who wants to vote for a deadbeat candidate? I wondered. What made the story especially ugly is that the day before the election, Fiorina paid back to herself $1 million of the $6.8 million she personally had lent to the campaign. If she had not paid herself, there would have been no debt for people who toiled rather furiously trying to get her elected. Among her creditors was the widow of political consultant Joe Shumate, who was owed $30,000.
In January, Fiorina paid off her 2010 campaign debts. She told radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt: "It's all been paid off, and as you know, campaign debt is nothing particularly new. Hillary Clinton had $25 million worth of it when she finished her last presidential run and, I don't know, took four years or something to pay it off. But we have no debt."
Note to Fiorina: It's rarely a plus to put yourself in the same basket as Hillary Clinton. This little episode -- rich woman stiffs staff -- reveals something words cannot make look good.
Democrats already have a playbook for going after GOP candidates who hail from today's cutthroat corporate culture. That's OK; Fiorina doesn't shrink from a fight. As she said at the Simi Valley debate, "if you want to stump a Democrat, ask them to name an accomplishment of Mrs. Clinton's." This could be a fascinating election to watch. 
dsaunders@sfchronicle.com

BEN CARSON IN CAIR’S CROSSHAIRS

Hamas-linked CAIR wants a Muslim President, and wants Carson to drop out for not wanting one.



September 21, 2015


U.S. Republican candidate Dr. Ben Carson speaks during the Heritage Action for America presidential candidate forum in Greenville, South Carolina September 18, 2015. REUTERS/Chris Keane - RTS1TKA

U.S. Republican candidate Dr. Ben Carson speaks during the Heritage Action for America presidential candidate forum in Greenville, South Carolina September 18, 2015. Photo by Chris Keane/Reuters
If Ibrahim Hooper of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has any say in the matter, whoever the next President is, it won’t be Ben Carson. “He is not qualified to be president of the United States,”fumed CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper, no doubt an unimpeachable authority on who is and is not qualified to be President, on Sunday. “You cannot hold these kinds of views and at the same time say you will represent all Americans, of all faiths and backgrounds.” What views? Carson said: “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.” He said that this was because Islam contradicted important Constitutional principles.
CAIR, designated a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates, sent out an email Sunday saying it would hold a news conference demanding that Carson withdraw from the presidential race for daring to say these things. “Mr. Carson clearly does not understand or care about the Constitution, which states that ‘no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office,'” said CAIR top dog Nihad Awad. “We call on our nation’s political leaders – across the political spectrum – to repudiate these unconstitutional and un-American statements and for Mr. Carson to withdraw from the presidential race.”
But the problems with a Muslim being President aren’t religious, they’re political. Islamic law infringes upon the freedom of speech, forbidding criticism of Islam. Islamic law denies equality of rights to women. Islamic law denies equality of rights to non-Muslims. If a Muslim renounced all this, he or she could be an effective Constitutional ruler, but in today’s politically correct climate, no one is even likely to ask for such a renunciation. Instead, no one even acknowledges that these really are elements of Islamic law.
No one, that is, except the Muslim clerics who agree with Carson. Syrian Islamic scholar Abd Al-Karim Bakkar said in March 2009: “Democracy runs counter to Islam on several issues….In democracy, legislation is the prerogative of the people. It is the people who draw up the constitution, and they have the authority to amend it as well. On this issue we differ” -- because in Islamic thought, only Allah legislates.
Abd Al-Karim Bakkar was reflecting a common view. Pakistan Muslim leader Sufi Muhammad said in May 2009: “I would not offer prayer behind anyone who would seek to justify democracy.” Mesbah Yazdi, leader of the Shia Taliban in Iran, said in September 2010 that “democracy, freedom, and human rights have no place” -- in Islam, that is. Australian Muslim cleric Ibrahim Saddiq Conlan said in June 2011: “Democracy is evil, the parliament is evil and legislation is evil.”
In January 2013, the Saudi Islamic scholar Sheikh Abdul Rahman bin Nassir Al Barrak declared: “Electing a president or another form of leadership or council members is prohibited in Islam as it has been introduced by the enemies of Moslems.” The idea of popular elections, he said, “has been brought by the anti-Islam parties who have occupied Moslem land.”
Some Muslims in the West hold these views as well. In April 2015, Muslims in Wales plastered Cardiff with posters reading: “Democracy is a system whereby man violates the right of Allah and decides what is permissible or impermissible for mankind, based solely on their whims and desires. This leads to a decayed and degraded society where crime and immorality becomes widespread and injustice becomes the norm. Islam is the only real, working solution for the UK. It is a comprehensive system of governance where the laws of Allah are implemented and justice is observed.”
And two Muslim groups in Denmark last June called on Muslims to boycott the elections that were held that month. One explained: “We are committed to being active participants in our society, but it has to be on Islam’s terms, without compromising our own principles and values. Democracy is fundamentally incompatible with Islam, and it is a sinking ship.” The Grimshøj mosque in Aarhus agreed, issuing a statement saying that “people should stay clear of the voting booths. We have concluded that only Allah can pass laws, as he says himself in the Koran that this is so.”
Tunisian author Salem Ben Ammar wrote last month: “‘To hell with democracy! Long live Islam!’ One hundred percent of Muslims agree with that. To say anything else is apostasy from Islam. These two competing political systems are antithetical to each other. You can’t be democratic and be a Muslim or a Muslim and be a democrat. A Jew can’t be a Nazi and a Nazi can’t be a Judeophile.”
Question for Hamas-linked CAIR’s Hooper and Awad: are all these Muslims “Islamophobes” for saying that Islam and democracy are incompatible, or is that honor reserved only for Carson (and other infidels)? And are either or both of you cognizant of the irony of pretending to uphold Constitutional values while demanding that a man drop out of the Presidential race for the crime of exercising his freedom of speech? Are either or both of you aware that you have thereby just become poster children for how correct Ben Carson really was?
Carson was right. But now the media sharks, ever eager to do the bidding of Hamas-linked CAIR and other Islamic supremacists, will be circling – and hungry. If he is forced to drop out for saying things CAIR doesn’t like, it will be just one more nail in the coffin of the free society that CAIR disingenuously professes to love and support, but which it is actually doing all it can to subvert.

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Pope Francis’ fact-free flamboyance


September 18, 2015
Pope Francis delivers his message during an audience with faithful at the Vatican. (Gregorio Borgia/Associated Press )
Pope Francis embodies sanctity but comes trailing clouds of sanctimony. With a convert’s indiscriminate zeal, he embraces ideas impeccably fashionable, demonstrably false and deeply reactionary. They would devastate the poor on whose behalf he purports to speak — if his policy prescriptions were not as implausible as his social diagnoses are shrill.
Supporters of Francis have bought newspaper and broadcast advertisements to disseminate some of his woolly sentiments that have the intellectual tone of fortune cookies. One example: “People occasionally forgive, but nature never does.” The Vatican’s majesty does not disguise the vacuity of this. Is Francis intimating that environmental damage is irreversible? He neglects what technology has accomplished regarding London’s air (see Page 1 of Dickens’s “Bleak House”) and other matters.
And the Earth is becoming “an immense pile of filth”? Hyperbole is a predictable precursor of yet another U.N. Climate Change Conference — the 21st since 1995. Fortunately, rhetorical exhibitionism increases as its effectiveness diminishes. In his June encyclical and elsewhere, Francis lectures about our responsibilities, but neglects the duty to be as intelligent as one can be. This man who says “the Church does not presume to settle scientific questions” proceeds as though everything about which he declaims is settled, from imperiled plankton to air conditioning being among humanity’s “harmful habits.” The church that thought it was settled science that Galileo was heretical should be attentive to all evidence.
Francis deplores “compulsive consumerism,” a sin to which the 1.3 billion persons without even electricity can only aspire. He leaves the Vatican to jet around praising subsistence farming, a romance best enjoyed from 30,000 feet above the realities that such farmers yearn to escape.
The saint who is Francis’s namesake supposedly lived in sweet harmony with nature. For most of mankind, however, nature has been, and remains, scarcity, disease and natural — note the adjective — disasters. Our flourishing requires affordable, abundant energy for the production of everything from food to pharmaceuticals. Poverty has probably decreased more in the past two centuries than in the preceding three millennia because of industrialization powered by fossil fuels. Only economic growth has ever produced broad amelioration of poverty, and since growth began in the late 18th century, it has depended on such fuels.
Matt Ridley, author of “The Rational Optimist,” notes that coal supplanting wood fuel reversed deforestation, and that “fertilizer manufactured with gas halved the amount of land needed to produce a given amount of food.” The capitalist commerce that Francis disdains is the reason the portion of the planet’s population living in “absolute poverty” ($1.25 a day) declined from 53 percent to 17 percent in three decades after 1981. Even in low-income countries, writes economist Indur Goklany, life expectancy increased from between 25 to 30 years in 1900 to 62 years today. Sixty-three percent of fibers are synthetic and derived from fossil fuels; of the rest, 79 percent come from cotton, which requires synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. “Synthetic fertilizers and pesticides derived from fossil fuels,” he says, “are responsible for at least 60 percent of today’s global food supply.” Without fossil fuels, he says, global cropland would have to increase at least 150 percent — equal to the combined land areas of South America and the European Union — to meet current food demands.
Francis grew up around the rancid political culture of Peronist populism, the sterile redistributionism that has reduced his Argentina from the world’s 14th highest per-capita gross domestic product in 1900 to 63rd today. Francis’s agenda for the planet — “global regulatory norms” — would globalize Argentina’s downward mobility.
As the world spurns his church’s teachings about abortion, contraception, divorce, same-sex marriage and other matters, Francis jauntily makes his church congruent with the secular religion of “sustainability.” Because this is hostile to growth, it fits Francis’s seeming sympathy for medieval stasis, when his church ruled the roost, economic growth was essentially nonexistent and life expectancy was around 30.
Francis’s fact-free flamboyance reduces him to a shepherd whose selectively reverent flock, genuflecting only at green altars, is tiny relative to the publicity it receives from media otherwise disdainful of his church. Secular people with anti-Catholic agendas drain his prestige, a dwindling asset, into promotion of policies inimical to the most vulnerable people and unrelated to what once was the papacy’s very different salvific mission.
He stands against modernity, rationality, science and, ultimately, the spontaneous creativity of open societies in which people and their desires are not problems but precious resources. Americans cannot simultaneously honor him and celebrate their nation’s premises.
Read more from George F. Will’s archive or follow him on Facebook.