Wednesday, August 08, 2018

Remembering Stan Mikita the wonderful man as well as the amazing hockey player


By Rick Telander
August 7, 2018
Related image
Good guy Stan Mikita died Tuesday at age 78.
The Hall of Fame center was surrounded by his family when he passed, and that’s a wonderful thing because family — whether his own flesh and blood or his Blackhawks teammates, with whom he played an astounding 22 years — was the center of his universe.
Those of us who are old enough to remember the Hawks’ glory days of the early 1960s on into the 1970s can recall Mikita, the firefly who stood only 5-9 and weighed about 165 pounds (does an early Patrick Kane come to mind?), and remember the way he flitted down the ice, helmet-free, the puck attached to his stick like a yo-yo to its string.
He set up teammates for goals, won face-offs and scored on his own in a fashion as graceful as it was focused. This was back in the day when smaller men often seemed to have the advantage over larger men simply because their skates were more like dancers’ slippers than metal entrapments.
It was also a time when the Hawks and ice hockey represented Chicago as the embodiment of hard work and sporting success. You have to remember that the Bulls didn’t exist until 1966; the Bears went into slumber after their 1963 NFL title; the Cubs had a nice season in 1969, then stunk; and the White Sox faded after their 1959 first-place finish in the American League.
The Hawks, even with no home games on TV, managed to capture the heart of this city at a time when winter and hockey and the old Chicago Stadium meant excitement on a transcendent scale.
And there in the middle was Mikita, with maybe the greatest and best sidekick ever — Hall of Fame winger Bobby ‘‘The Golden Jet’’ Hull — sharing the spotlight for years . Mikita, who, perhaps appropriately, had a far more pedestrian nickname — ‘‘Stosh’’— finished his career in 1980 as the Hawks’ all-time regular-season scoring leader with 1,467 points on 541 goals and 926 assists.
That success pretty much speaks for itself. As do the many awards he won, including two Hart Trophies as the NHL’s most valuable player, the four leading scorer crowns (1964, 1965, 1967, 1967), and the pair of Lady Byng Trophies for sportsmanship and gentlemanly play. Those last two honors got to the essence of Mikita’s spirit, a man who could compete ferociously at the highest level and yet remain a decent, empathetic — yes, dignified — human being.
Mikita was all that. He likely learned the empathy part as a child who came to Canada from a small town in what was then Czechoslovakia, speaking no English, to live with — and take the last name of — his mother’s brother’s family. It might not be well-known, but Mikita’s given last name is Gvoth, not Mikita.
Would he have been the secret star of the 1992 hit movie ‘‘Wayne’s World’’ if he was Stanislav Gvoth? Yeah, probably. Because his good nature was always there, especially when he agreed to let writer and star Mike Myers make his movie coffee shop a place called ‘‘Stan Mikita’s Donuts,’’ with a huge, revolving replica of Mikita in his Hawks uniform on the roof. Mikita had some lines in the movie, but, sadly, they were cut.
Myers, nevertheless, a huge hockey fan from Toronto, was starstruck. ‘‘It was like, ‘Oh, my God, that’s Stan Mikita.’ That’s crazy,’’ he said later. ‘‘He’s just a hero. A great, hunky hero. He was gracious and lovely and fantastic.”
Mikita was charitable, too, starting a hockey school for deaf children and doing countless charitable appearances. Things became testy between him and the Hawks when old-school big-boss owner Bill Wirtz ran the team like some corner store from the 19th century. But things were smoothed over when Wirtz died and his innovative son Rocky took over in 2008.
Mikita had helped win that glorious 1961 Stanley Cup — the one that had to hold up until the Hawks finally won again in 2010. He was a key player when the Hawks lost in the Final four more times (1962, 1965, 1971, 1973), and always that big, round, unmistakable face meant cold steel on ice was comin’ at you.
Some hockey experts have said Mikita was the best player ever. I don’t know about that. To me, it’s impossible to make such a decision.
Some people say the best player ever was there on another shift — Hull, the man who teamed up with Stosh for 14 years. But it matters little how these ratings go.
Mikita was a superstar, a beautiful competitor and man. He brought Chicago great pleasure.
His statue in front of the United Center is there to inform those who never knew.
Related image

Paul Manafort and Feinstein's China Spy


By Daniel John Sobieski

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/08/paul_manafort_and_feinsteins_china_spy.html

August 8, 2018

Political Cartoons by Steve Breen

Paul Manafort stands trial in Special Counsel Robert Mueller's dock for a tax evasion case that the Department of Justice in 2005 decided there wasn't enough evidence to prosecute for no other reason than he later worked for Donald Trump.  Perhaps now he wishes he had been the office manager for California senator Dianne Feinstein (D), who hired a Chinese spy to be her driver and office manager, for there seems to be a double standard here when it comes to working with agents for a foreign power.

There is no evidence or even a suggestion that Feinstein was colluding with the Chinese, just as there is no evidence that President Trump or Paul Manafort, during his short stint as Trump's campaign manager, colluded with Russia.  Yet Manafort is being persecuted...er, prosecuted for a minor crime while the Chinese spy, Russell Lowe, was allowed to pack his box and leave.  No criminal prosecution and no special counsel to see where this thread might unravel.  Again, the difference is that Manafort worked for Trump, and Lowe worked for Feinstein – ironically, one of the leaders in the Russian collusion witch hunt.

Imagine if this were Donald Trump's personal driver being groomed by Beijing's security service to spy on his boss and pass information to the local Chinese consulate and handlers when traveling abroad.  Faster than you can say "Carter Page," a special counsel would be appointed to nail the president for treasonous collusion.

In these cases, the FBI normally gives the organization or office in question what is called a "defensive briefing" – an alert that an individual is up to no good or suspected of doing something sneaky.  The office or organization can then take action.  This was done in Feinstein's case, but not for Trump.

In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal noted the mind-boggling double standard employed by the FBI in dealing with spies and suspected spies in the employ of Feinstein and Trump:

Foreign countries are always trying to steal U.S. secrets, and they sometimes succeed.  In this case Mrs. Feinstein tweeted over the weekend that the FBI approached her five years ago with concerns about an "administrative" staffer in her San Francisco office with "no access to sensitive information."  She said she "learned the facts and made sure the employee left my office immediately."

This is what the FBI should do, and the question Mr. Trump should ask is why the bureau didn't treat him as a potential President with the same customary courtesy.  The FBI claims it had concerns beginning in spring 2016 that low-level Trump campaign staffers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos were colluding with Russians.  Yet rather than give the Trump campaign the usual defensive briefing, the FBI launched an unprecedented counterintelligence investigation into a presidential campaign, running informants against it and obtaining surveillance warrants.  The country is still enduring the polarizing fallout from that decision through special counsel Robert Mueller's probe[.] ...

Mrs. Feinstein is also doing nobody a favor by downplaying this breach.  She claims the driver never had access to "sensitive" information, but the infiltration of the staff of a Senator who serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee is no small matter.  Who knows what the spying staffer was able to hear and report to China over the years?

The FBI of Andrew McCabe, James Comey, and Peter Strzok did not extend the Trump campaign the same courtesy because its leaders wanted to unseat a president they despised and had no such animus against a liberal Democratic senator.


Manafort's financial dealings with Ukraine are the centerpiece of a criminal trial, but no one seems curious about the remarkable financial success Feinstein and her third husband, Richard Blum, had in dealings with China with a Chinese spy on her payroll who arrived on the scene in 1993, one year after Feinstein was elected to the Senate.  As the Los Angeles Times has reported:

On Capitol Hill, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) has emerged as one of the staunchest proponents of closer U.S. relations with China, fighting for permanent most-favored-nation trading status for Beijing.

At the same time, far from the spotlight, Feinstein's husband, Richard C. Blum, has expanded his private business interests in China – to the point that his firm is now a prominent investor inside the communist nation[.] ...

In 1992, when Feinstein entered the Senate, Blum's interests in China amounted to one project worth less than $500,000, according to her financial disclosure reports.  But since then, his financial activities in the country have increased.

In the last year, a Blum investment firm paid $23 million for a stake in a Chinese government-owned steel enterprise and acquired sizable interests in the leading producers of soybean milk and candy in China.  Blum's firm, Newbridge Capital Ltd., received an important boost from a $10-million investment by the International Finance Corp., an arm of the World Bank.  Experts said that IFC backing typically confers legitimacy and can help attract other investors.

No conflict of interest here.  "Here's a more recent connection between Sen Feinstein and China the press has ignored.  ZTE, the heavily sanctioned Chinese telecom company that paid a $1bn fine to the U.S., hired its first in-house lobbyist in '11 – none other than a former Feinstein aide," noted Benjamin Weingarten, a contributor for the Federalist, in a tweet.  As the Washington Post reported in 2012, Feinstein has a connection to the notorious Chinese communications firm ZTE:

ZTE, which is also based in Shenzhen, spent $80,000 on U.S. lobbying in the first six months of this year, down from $100,000 for the same period a year earlier, Senate records show.  In October 2011, the company registered its first in-house lobbyist, Peter Ruffo, a former aide to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.).

Clearly, there is more here than meets the eye.  Perhaps we might need a special counsel to follow the evidence wherever it may lead.  Right, Mr. Mueller?


A Must-Read 'Fiery Angel' by Michael Walsh


August 5, 2018

Image result for the fiery angel walsh

Michael Walsh, the distinguished novelist and music critic, is one of the very few writers in the conservative world who consistently finds new and important things to say. I read everything he writes and have his books on automatic pre-order. We met a couple of years ago as speakers on a Hillsdale College cruise, and I had the privilege of long conversations with Michael, the sort of luxuriant and unhurried exchanges that one reads about in the novels of Thomas Mann but have disappeared in the age of texting. His latest book, The Fiery Angel, does not disappoint. It is edgy and provocative. As Goethe wrote, I salute the learned gentleman: He really made me sweat.

As a matter of full disclosure, Michael quotes my writings on music in this book at such length that I cannot fairly review it; I had just the same problem with his previous book, The Devil's Pleasure Palace. Call this an appreciation rather than a review, but buy The Fiery Angel in any case.

Sergei Prokofiev's 1926 opera "The Fiery Angel" provides Walsh with a point of departure. The Russian composer drew on Valery Bryusov's occult novel, which the author described as "a True Story of the Devil who at Various Times Appeared to an Innocent Virgin in the Shape of a Holy Angel, Luring her to Sinful Actions; of the Ungodly Practices of Magic...." A demon takes hold of the female protagonist Renata. Neither the chaste love of Ruprecht nor the ministrations of the Church can rid her of the incubus. At length she repairs to a convent, but her possession infects the other nuns, and the Inquisition decides to burn her at the stake. The opera is noisy, cacaphonic and merrily perverse; a 2017 Mariinsky Theater version conducted by Valery Gergiev, the reigning superstar of Russian music, is available on YouTube. The concluding R-rated demonic orgy at the convent is at hour/minute 1:49. If you choose to watch it, make sure the kids are out of the room. That isn't the Prokofiev of "Peter and the Wolf." The prudish Bolsheviks suppressed the opera, which premiered in Paris after Stalin's death.

"The Fiery Angel," along with Ravel's "Gaspard de la Nuit" and other 20th-century music experiments with evil, occupy the first chapters of Walsh's book. He sees a sign of hope in the very destruction. Prokofiev's flaming angel Madiel "always reappears, to tempt and guide us, if only we will swallow our fear, open ourselves to wonder and follow." Walsh adds:

In sum, the West's fascination with evil and its willingness to accommodate it up to a point--and sometimes beyond that point--is both its Achilles' heel and its unique cultural strength, the quality that sets it apart from the hierarchical societies of the Middle East and Asia. The cultural-Marxist Left has sought to tar the Christian and post-Christian West with the very sin it so admires in other cultures, and has created a fantasy history in which a hapless proletariat had an arbitrary dogma imposed upon it by popes and potentates, from which it has been crying out ever since for "liberation." That Marxism is the very definition of an imposition seems not to occur to some, while for others is the very feature of the system they wish to impose.
Michael believes that the West's capacity to wrestle with evil is its strength: It is inherently fluid, creative and undogmatic, unlike the pseudo-Puritan political correctness of the Marxists and identity politicians.

I'm not so sure. Michael is a conservatory-trained classical pianist and served for years as Time magazine's chief classical music critic, so both his chops and his credentials are impeccable. But I do not see in Prokofiev or Ravel a rebirth of the Western spirit in a different, fiery form. Truth told, I find the Prokofiev opera painful to hear.

I think that Thomas Mann nailed the matter in his great novel Doktor Faustus, in which his protagonist, the fictional composer Adrian Leverkuhn, announces in his syphilitic dementia that he wants to "take back Beethoven's 9th symphony" by writing a parody that will prevent anyone from hearing Beethoven properly again. That, as I wrote in a 1991 article in the Musical Quarterly, is the content of Debussy's "esoteric" musical language, and that, as I argued in a 2010 essay for First Things, is why Wagner has corrupted our capacity to hear the classical composers. Wagner, Debussy and their successors didn't do anything new, in my analysis: Even in their most rarified flights of musical fancy they look backward to the classical style of composition. Their putative innovations actually are variants of classical techniques, sometimes open, and (I say at the risk of the charge of Straussianism) esoteric, in the case of Debussy. That explains why modernism had only a couple of fertile generations after the death of Brahms in 1894, and nothing more. It was too dependent on a past that grew increasingly remote. The modernist re-purposing of classical techniques, moreover, ruined our ears to a lamentable extent.

The definitive treatment of evil in Western music is found in Mozart's opera Don Giovanni, one of more than 1,720 published variants of the Don Juan story since Tirso de Molina's 1616 original. Tirso's Don Juan is not a great lover but a rapist and serial killer from the high nobility of Spain; his social position makes it difficult to stop him. He is a believing Catholic and is quite sure that his soul will be saved when he repents at some future point. In the meantime, he enjoys raping and killing and doesn't want to give up his pastimes. Tirso's (and Mozart's) point is that the Catholic model of salvation can be gamed by a sociopath. That was also the Protestant objection, but Luther and Calvin found no means to correct the problem except by asserting Double Predestination. The West in my view is poorly equipped to deal with the problem of evil, and I view Prokofiev's opera and similar exercises less charitably than he does.

Tuesday, August 07, 2018

Shooting Up Chicago


Thugs Terrorize Their Neighbors in the Windy City


By Heather Mac Donald
https://www.city-journal.org/html/chicago-violence-16098.html
August 7, 2018


Image result for chicago shootings august 2018
(Chicago Sun-Times)

An explosion of drive-by shootings erupted on Chicago’s South and West sides this weekend. At least 74 people were shot, and 11 killed, between 3 p.m. on Friday and 6 a.m. on Monday. In one seven-hour stretch, starting around midnight on Saturday, at least 40 people were shot, four fatally, as gunmen targeted a block party, the aftermath of a funeral, and a front porch, reports the Chicago Tribune. Over two and a half hours that morning, 25 people were shot in five multiple-injury shootings, including a 17-year-old who died after being shot in the face. An 11-year-old boy, a 13-year-old boy, and a 14-year-old girl were also hit over the course of the weekend’s bloodbath. Mt. Sinai’s emergency room shut down for several hours due to the overload of bodies; in May, the entire hospital went into lockdown following a virtual riot in its lobby among gangbangers, reported Tribune columnist John Kass.

Meantime, Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois attorney general Lisa Madigan recently celebrated the issuance of a 232-page draft consent decree for the Chicago Police Department, possibly the longest police consent decree ever written. Among numerous other red-tape-generating provisions, it requires the CPD to revise its protocols regarding “transgender, intersex, and gender non-conforming individuals,” to make sure that the CPD policies properly define these terms and that officers address intersex, transgender, and the gender non-conforming with the “names, pronouns and titles of respect appropriate to that individual’s gender.” Last Thursday, a so-called anti-violence march shut down Lake Shore Drive to demand that the CPD hire more black officers and that City Hall spend more on social programs in the black community. Few voices, in other words, are tackling the actual cause of Chicago’s violence: the breakdown of the black family structure and a demoralized police department.

If the mayor signs the consent decree, the police department will have to divert further resources from on-the-ground enforcement toward collection of racial data and training in the phony theory of implicit bias. A court granted the ACLU of Illinois and Black Lives Matter Chicago permission to intervene in the consent decree negotiations. This is the same ACLU that muscled the CPD into introducing a new three-page stop, question, and frisk form in January 2016 that contributed to Chicago’s shooting spike, already accelerating due to Black Lives Matter-driven anti-cop hatred. The ACLU and BLM Chicago will also be able to enforce the new consent decree in court, spelling further trouble for professional policing.

To be sure, shootings are down this year, compared with the high-water marks of 2016 and 2017, but that’s cold comfort for the 1,700 people—more than eight daily—shot through the end of July. But while shootings have crested at least temporarily, other indications of chaos and disorder are up. Carjackings have nearly tripled since 2015, with an increasing share committed by juveniles, thanks to a law exempting young carjackers from adult penalties. In downtown Chicago, youth mobs have been running riot. Large groups of teens regularly swarm across major intersections, jumping on the tops of cars caught in the stampede. Over the 2018 Memorial Day weekend, teens ran down Michigan Avenue, punching people and vandalizing stores; a group of eight to ten boys knocked a fifteen-year-old boy to the ground, then stomped on his head and kicked his ribs, back, and face, before emptying his pockets and taking his shoes. The police made almost no arrests during the melee, preferring to avoid confrontation. In March, gunfire erupted during a fight between two groups of youths in the Water Tower Place mall.

“The city is lost,” a federal prosecutor tells me. “We have never had crimes like this downtown—people getting shoved and robbed at 3 p.m. It’s just brazen.” This prosecutor has started avoiding the Magnificent Mile on Saturday afternoons. “I’m scared to be downtown,” she says. A Chicago police detective with 24 years on the job observes: “The kids who are mobbing downtown are the same ones doing the carjackings. This generation of kids has grown up with no one daring to touch them.”

Chicago’s mayoral contenders seized on this weekend’s violence to further their campaigns. Sadly for Chicago, a leader in Black Lives Matter, Ja’Mal Green, is one of those mayoral candidates. If Green has ever seen a police officer whom he supports, he is not letting on. Black Lives Matter was front and center during the protests against the CPD following an officer shooting of an armed man last month. Predictably, Green called for more government “investment” in inner-city neighborhoods.

Garry McCarthy, who headed the CPD when Laquan McDonald was infamously shot in 2014, blasted Emanuel for ignoring the violence in favor of downtown development. (The McDonald shooting triggered the consent-decree process, initially prosecuted by the Obama Justice Department but thankfully halted by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, only to be resurrected by Madigan and Emanuel.) But McCarthy engaged in some fake news, suggesting that the public should not buy the fact that the murder rate is actually down, in light of this weekend’s violence. McCarthy ran Compstat (the revolutionary police-accountability system) for the New York Police Department; he of all people should know that both facts can be true: murder and shootings can be down from the 2016 and 2017 rates and still be unacceptably high.

McCarthy should be talking about two things on the campaign trail: getting out of the street-stop agreement that he himself signed with the ACLU, and halting the impending consent decree. Until the shooting of McDonald, the academic Left had celebrated the CPD as a model of progressive policing. It still is. What it needs is support from the public and Chicago’s political class and the confidence to go back to proactive enforcement.

But policing is only a second-best solution to the anarchy in inner-city communities. The best solution is a culture of marriage that expects boys to take responsibility for the children they conceive. As long as more than three-quarters of Chicago’s inner-city children are raised without their fathers, black-on-black violence will continue. And the national press will take notice only when the numbers are too egregious to ignore.

Heather Mac Donald is the Thomas W. Smith Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a contributing editor of City Journal, and the author of The War on Cops and the forthcoming The Diversity Delusion.

Christopher Robin: A Winnie the Pooh Movie for Adults


Finally, a summer film that's light on CGI and demographic pandering, and heavy on joy.


August 7, 2018

Image result for christopher robin 2018

One of the most memorable books I’ve read is Lev Grossman’s 2009 fantasy novel The Magicians, in which a group of disaffected young adults stumbles into the Narnia-like world of their youthful imaginings. But rather than discovering hope and meaning, they find only a new canvas on which their worst, most hedonistic instincts play out. It’s a haunting indictment of “escapist” impulses in fantasy literature.
Christopher Robin—a spiritual sequel to A.A. Milne’s classic Winnie the Pooh stories centered on their human protagonist (Ewan McGregor)—springs from a similar premise, but takes precisely the opposite thematic tack. If The Magicians is a story about the loss of innocence, Christopher Robin is a tale of regaining it.
As the film opens, Christopher bids farewell to his childhood companions—Pooh, Piglet, Tigger, Eeyore, and the rest—and departs the Hundred Acre Woods for boarding school. In an Up-style opening montage, we see his life unfold: being reprimanded by his teachers for daydreaming, mourning the sudden death of his father, meeting his wife Evelyn (Hayley Atwell), and struggling across the grisly battlefields of World War II.
Upon his return from the war—and first meeting with his daughter—Christopher takes a job as efficiency manager at a luggage manufacturer. We meet adult Christopher just as he’s charged with reducing company expenses by 20 percent, a grim task likely involving headcount reduction. What’s more, the project will require him to work all weekend, forcing him to break a previous promise to accompany Evelyn and his daughter to the countryside.
Help is on the way though. The Hundred Acre Woods have grown dark and gloomy since Christopher’s departure, and Pooh won’t stand for it. The beloved bear slips through a hidden gateway and into London, where he’s promptly reunited with his old friend.
Got all that?
One thing’s for sure: Christopher Robin is a strange sort of movie, one that, unusually for risk-averse Hollywood, doesn’t clearly cater to a particular demographic. It’s a slow, elegiac film, largely taken up with long scenes of Christopher and Pooh talking about—I’m not kidding—the nature of the good life. And true to that sensibility, in this retelling Pooh occupies a space somewhere between Yoda and Socrates. He’s less interested in honey and pratfalls than in rekindling Christopher’s joy in being.
It’s Christopher Robin’s depiction of the loss of that joy that hits the hardest (and likely resonates the least with young viewers). A key subplot, for instance, involves Christopher’s fixation on his daughter’s test results. When she asks him to read to her before bedtime, he immediately turns to a textbook on industrialization in Victorian England. Children may know instinctively that something’s off about this, but they won’t really grasp the sharpness of the film’s point.
Indeed, in many ways kids don’t really seem to be the target audience here. Sure, there are a few Disneyesque storytelling flourishes, especially towards the end, but these feel more like afterthoughts than focal points. With the exception of its detailed CGI animal characters, this is a fairly spartan and restrained production (and I mean that in the best possible way). Goofiness is kept to a minimum.
Instead, and perhaps surprisingly, Christopher Robin is genuinely willing to let its hero mature. This becomes clear when it’s viewed alongside its closest analogue, Steven Spielberg’s Hook, which followed an adult Peter Pan who’d forgotten the ways of Neverland. In Hook, Peter’s “redemption” is largely accomplished through his return to the ways of childhood. In order to vanquish his foe, he must step back into the identity of Peter Pan, an emotional and spiritual regression. As a result, what’s meant to delight—Peter’s return—comes off as merely depressing.
Christopher Robin rejects that tradeoff. His odyssey is less a journey of personal self-discovery than a roundabout road to rejoining his family and to being the father that his daughter needs. The fundamental lesson of the film is that one can always embrace the essential values of the Hundred Acre Woods—gratitude, contemplation, and imagination—without sacrificing the wisdom learned in the crucible of adult life. In short, rather than encouraging adults to be more childish, it exhorts adults to be more fully adult. And that is a surprising and welcome insight.
In so doing, Christopher Robin moves beyond the nihilism of The Magicians and its ilk. This is not a story of destroying innocence by importing the baggage of adulthood into the past, but the opposite. It’s a tale of restoring hope by applying the maxims of the past to the present. Live in such a way that you cherish family and apprehend beauty, the film reminds us. You knew this once. Remember it in the face of material temptation.
That’s not a message I would have found particularly intelligible as a child. I probably would have wanted more action, more danger, more overt onscreen drama. But watching it through older eyes, I find that the movie’s refusal to gratify those desires is what makes it so unexpectedly moving.
As C.S. Lewis once memorably wrote, “some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again.” It’s in that spirit that Christopher Robin succeeds.
John Ehrett is executive editor of Conciliar Post and a graduate of Yale Law School.

Politicians, Media Unfairly Single Out Football's Concussion Risk


By John R. Lott
https://townhall.com/columnists/johnrlottjr/2018/08/06/football-concussions-n2507163
August 6, 2018


Image result for football tackle

With the pro-football season starting this coming week for most teams, media outlets have returned to their steady drumbeat about concussions. Despite the excitement of kickoff returns, college football has bowed to pressure with a new rule this year to discourage kickoff returns.  

But if the media really cares about concussions, they shouldn't be singling out this uniquely American sport.

Women’s soccer players suffer a higher concussion rate than do male football players. A woman's soccer player who plays 10,000 games or practices would on average suffer 6.3 concussions. Compare that to 6.1 for men's football. But men’s wrestling and hockey have even much higher concussion rates of 12.4 and 8.4, respectively.

Concussions aren't the only problem. Both men's and women's soccer exceed men's football in total injuries. The injury rate is 11.14 per 10,000 athletic exposures for men's soccer and 9.7 for women's soccer. For football, it is 9.5 per 10,000.

College athletes suffer about twice the frequency of concussions as high school athletes. In high school, football is riskier than soccer. But girls' and boys' soccer are still the second and third most dangerous sports for concussions, followed closely by girls' basketball.

But evidence also shows that soccer is responsible for more of the serious concussions among high school athletes. Soccer concussions are about twice as likely as football concussions to require 22 or more days of recovery.

Most concussions in soccer occur for the same reason as in football — collisions with other players. But heading the ball is another huge cause of concussions in soccer. In high school, contact with "equipment" is about nine times more likely to cause concussions in boys' soccer as in football. Heading is even more dangerous for women.

Unfortunately, soccer players are much less likely than football players to recognize that they have suffered a concussion. So, they are less likely to take the time to rest and get treatment. Perhaps players aren’t aware of the dangers because the media only fixates on concussions from football.

An article in the Journal of Neurology compared soccer players from several professional Dutch clubs with a control group of elite athletes in non-contact sports. The study found that professional soccer players exhibited relatively impaired performances in memory, planning, and visual perceptions. How poorly the players functioned was related directly to how frequently they had headed the soccer ball.

College football mandated helmets in 1939, and the NFL followed suit in 1943. Since then, the gear has undergone regular improvements. But despite new research showing that soccer helmets can reduce the rate of concussions by up to 70%, soccer remains resistant to any change. There is still no media drumbeat against the sport.

Still, even staying away from sports won’t guarantee protection from concussions. A new study this year in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine found that even theater isn’t a safe extra curricular choice for students.  The study found a “stunning” rate of “concussion-related symptoms”: 77 percent had a least one head injury and 39 percent had at least five.  Unfortunately, 70 percent continued working even after having concussion-related symptoms. 

Politicians have helped create the perception that football is particularly risky. Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), the second-ranking Democrat, has introduced legislation mandating research on concussions in football, hockey, basketball, and baseball. But there is no mention of soccer.   Senators Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) want to pass stricter safety standards for high school football helmets.  Former President Obama went so far as to say in 2014, "I would not let my son play pro football."

If football is such a scourge, where is the concern over even riskier sports such as soccer, hockey, and wrestling?

Soccer might currently be the "in" politically-correct sport that is played by supposedly culturally superior Europeans, but parents who push their children into playing it for safety reasons are in for an unpleasant surprise.

CONSCIENCE. CHARACTER. COURAGE.


Tommy Robinson's story.



By Bruce Bawer
August 7, 2018


Image result for tommy robinson

I didn't think I could get any more outraged than I already was over the recent abuse of Tommy Robinson by the British deep state. Arrested during a live Facebook broadcast from outside Leeds Crown Court, he was rushed through a travesty of a trial, then shipped to a prison before the day was over, only to be released – after nearly three months of cruel and unusual punishment – when the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales finally declared the whole process thoroughly illegitimate. 
Clearly, there were people high up in the system who were out to get him. To put the country's most outspoken critic of Islam in a hoosegow where he'd be surrounded by Muslims and, with any luck, would end up being found dead in his cell of unknown causes. 
As I say, I didn't think I could be more outraged. But then I caught up with Tommy's autobiography, Enemy of the State,which was first published in 1988 and which I read in a 2015 revised edition. By turns riveting, frustrating, and inspiring, it tells the story of an ordinary working-class lad – a good soul and solid friend, if a bit of a mischief-maker – who gradually came to understand that his country faced an existential threat from an enemy within, and, driven by a conscience of remarkable magnitude, became an activist. 
What was it, exactly, that drove Tommy to activism? Well, to begin with, his hometown, Luton, where he still lives, was a place where he had friends, white and black and brown, from a wide range of backgrounds – but where one tight-knit group, namely Muslims, seemed to hold all the cards, standing apart from (and above) all the others, refusing to blend in, treating the kafir with arrogance and contempt. 
While professing to be exceedingly devout – and demanding, for this reason, that special allowances be made to accommodate their religious practices and prohibitions – the Muslim community leaders ran drug and prostitution rings, raped non-Muslim girls as casually as if they were consuming a kebab, and expertly manipulated pusillanimous government authorities who were not only terrified to arrest them for even the most bloodcurdling infraction but who were, on the contrary, eager to throw money at them, with a smile and a bow, in response to their “piss-and-moan stories about deprivation and prejudice.” 
This, then, was the environment in which Tommy grew up. Then came 9/11. It horrified him. On the first anniversary of 9/11, while the terrorist organization Al Muhajiroun was holding a conference in London to celebrate the hijackers, posters were put up all over Luton glorifying the so-called “Magnificent 19.” The authorities did nothing about any of this. He was appalled. Two years later, a group of Luton Muslims stated in a national media interview that they looked forward to a 9/11 in Britain; their leader, Sayful Islam, made it clear that he “wanted to see our children assassinated, executed.” The cops didn't even call them in for questioning. 
As Tommy writes, “here was the great British public, sitting around listening to it, giving him [Sayful Islam] a public platform and doing nothing about it.” What set Tommy apart from the rest of the British public was one thing: “I had to do something.” But what? What to do? After the 2004 massacre of schoolchildren in the Russian town of Beslan, which also had a profound impact on him, he looked around. As far as he could see, “the only people talking about it, getting angry, were the BNP” – the British National Party. He joined – but quit soon after, when they turned out to be racists who wouldn't let a couple of his best friends, who were black, join up. 
The British media still use his fifteen minutes of BNP membership against him. They're only indicting themselves. If Tommy (or anyone) had knocked at the door of the BBC instead of the BNP, asking to do some real investigative journalism about the likes of Sayful Islam, he'd have been shown the door. They were too busy giving softball interviews to – and thus helping to legitimize – people like Sayful. Best for social harmony and all that, you know. 
Anyway, then came what would prove a fateful day. At a homecoming parade for a Luton battalion that had fought in Afghanistan, a large cohort of Muslims led by Sayful Islam were not only allowed to protest – they were accorded special protection by the police, who escorted them, as if they were some royal delegation, to a spot “where they were perfectly positioned to shout their abuse at the soldiers.” What should have been a proud, patriotic event, in short, was hijacked, turned into an opportunity for a display of hatred toward the UK – and a chilling assertion of burgeoning, malevolent power. 
Long story short, that incident led Tommy and some friends to form the English Defence League (EDL).
They weren't violent. They weren't “far right,” despite the claims of a thousand headlines. At the time, Tommy didn't even know what “right” or “left” meant, in terms of politics. He was a total political naïf, who scarcely ever watched the TV news or read a daily paper. So green was he that he gave his first major national interview to the Guardian, not realizing that it was a hard-core propaganda organ of the British left and therefore disinclined, to put it mildly, to give a chap like him a fair shakeTommy brought along three of his mates, all black, to the meeting with the Guardian reporter – and when the article came out, it described him as a racist and dropped his black friends down the memory hole. 
This kept happening. It's still happening.
Tommy knew he had fans. But for a long time there, few of them dared speak up publicly. “When I was interviewed in ITV's Daybreak,” he recalls, “people followed me outside to shake my hand and encourage me to carry on with what we were doing. But would they ever admit to doing that, to voicing their support? Never.” Such expressions of solidarity, he writes, are “heartening to an extent I suppose, but one of these days all of those people are going to have to make a decision about exactly how much they care, how much support they're willing to give in public.”  
Yep. 
Tommy's book is awash in such dispiriting accounts of cowardice. Cowardly citizens willing only to whisper friendly words. Cowardly lawyers, eager to represent child-killers but not Tommy Robinson. Cowardly cops who – while repeatedly harrassing Tommy, trumping up charges against him, and digging through his life in search of excuses to arrest him – leave the vilest of Muslim malefactors alone because they “don't want to provoke a commotion with 'the community.'” 
Then there's the execrable Theresa May herself. While she was Home Secretary, Tommy managed to bluff his way into a sit-down. “I showed her a video of a white girl getting beaten up by a Muslim gang,” he recalls, “but she wouldn't look at it. And so I kept rewinding it and replaying. She eventually looked because she could see I wasn't stopping, but all she would say was, 'I can't comment.' I told her, 'No, but you would comment if it was a white gang attacking a woman in a burkha.'”  
It was during one of his many unjustly imposed and unduly harsh stretches in prison that Tommy, after being handed a Koran by Muslim missionaries, finally read the thing. Suddenly “Islamic prejudices didn't seem so prejudiced at all.” Why? Because “[m]ost of what I'd heard second and third hand was right there in black and white, absolute encouragement – no, a divine instruction – to act atrociously towards the rest of the world. Obey Allah or burn in hell forever.” Not only was reading the Koran eye-opening; so was discovering that – as it turned out – many of his Muslim fellow prisoners, many of them converts and all of them constantly feigning piety, didn't have a clue what was really in their holy book. 
In his closing pages, Tommy praises Douglas Murray for being the only non-prole Brit who tells the truth about Islam (“It makes a world of difference....Lads like me march and we're thugs. Middle class tweedies march and the nation is speaking”), eviscerates his local MP (a “useless waste of Parliamentary space” who, after having been “front and centre” at a local “Celebrate Muhammed” event, proved, when confronted by Tommy, not to know a single blessed thing about Islam's prophet), and delivers a warning: people in Britain “are sleepwalking our way towards a Muslim takeover of the country.” Truer words were never spoken. 
So ends Tommy's autobiography. But his life story is far from over. This year it began its second act, in quite spectacular fashion. During the weeks since his illegitimate arrest, trial, conviction, and incarceration, the rulers of his country have put him through perhaps even worse hell than they ever did before. Not a single member of the House of Commons spoke up for him. Nor, unless I missed something, did any major British celebrity or aristocrat come to his defense. Even leading British critics of Islam toed the line. 
But tens of thousands of British subjects filled the streets to champion his cause. People around the world found out about him online and expressed their support. He has become one of the most internationally renowned and respected of living Britons. Millions realize that he, more than any other individual, may well represent the best hope for Britain's survival. 
Which raises the question: will the British authorities dare to treat him now as they have before? When he was arrested back in May, they still viewed him as a lowlife whom they could, with complete impunity, treat as cruelly and unfairly as they wished. Can they still do that now, when the world's eyes are on Tommy – and on them?
That's one question. Another is whether Tommy's heroic example can be translated into real change. A large proportion of Brits know he's right. But to what degree do they share his conscience, his character, and his courage? How many of them have heard, or will soon hear – and heed – a voice inside telling them that they, too, have to do something? 
The future of Britain depends on the answer to that question.  
Bruce Bawer is the author of “While Europe Slept,” “Surrender,” and "The Victims' Revolution." His novel "The Alhambra" has just been published.

Monday, August 06, 2018

Inside the Discovery of Mike Trout


By Buster Olney
July 29, 2018
Image result for mike trout 2018
Editor's Note: To watch Buster Olney's complete E:60 profile of Mike Trout, stream it on the ESPN app or desktop now by clicking here.

Greg Morhardt was the Los Angeles Angels' scout assigned to oversee the Northeast corridor a dozen years ago, and on a beautiful, late-summer day, he watched over a flock of high school age ballplayers in New Jersey. When somebody mentioned that the last name of the muscular kid with the football-player build standing out at shortstop was Trout, Morhardt immediately wondered whether he had a connection with the teenager.
More than two decades before, Morhardt had played minor league baseball with a Trout, Jeff Trout. He was fast, Morhardt recalled, and a really good hitter, someone who might have had a little time in the big leagues if he had hung around pro ball a few more years. But Morhardt had been present when Jeff met Debbie Busonick, and Jeff and Debbie married, moved beyond the uncertainty of minor league baseball and returned to Jeff's hometown in southern New Jersey to raise a family.
That was the last Morhardt had heard of his old teammate. Now Morhardt was at a ballfield tracking this teenager with the last name of Trout -- in Jersey. It had to be more than a coincidence, he thought. "Is that Jeff Trout's kid?" Morhardt asked somebody else at the workout, and he was told, yes, that's Jeff and Debbie's son. That's Mike Trout.
Morhardt's reunion with the former teammate he called Trouter would have to wait, however, because Jeff was not hovering over his son that day. Morhardt and Jeff Trout didn't talk again until another day, another time. Jeff was not at a lot of Mike's high school workouts and practices, in fact.
Jeff Trout had set all the Millville High School records that Mike would break, he had starred at the University of Delaware, he had played four years in the Minnesota Twins' farm system, hitting .321 and posting a .406 on-base percentage in 1986, and he coached at Millville High School. But as Mike Trout advanced in baseball and began to draw the attention of Morhardt and other scouts, Jeff Trout made the decision to step back from coaching his son.
Major League Baseball will forever be played by a lot of young men whose fathers have coaxed and nudged them through every swing of every inning of every game. Truth be told, some of the same players have felt smothered by the omnipresence of their fathers, some of them haunted as they tried and sometimes failed to live out the dreams of someone whose love they cherished.
Mike Trout is not one of those players.
When Mike reached the ninth grade and began to create a future in baseball, generating awe in scouts such as Morhardt with his speed, Jeff and Debbie Trout attended his games in lawn chairs, captured video, cheered for Mike and his teammates -- and left the instruction and coaching of their son to others, a calculated distance that remains in place today.
"I know he's already got a lot of pressure, a lot of people coming at him," Jeff Trout said. "There's no sense in us adding to that."
Mike is the youngest of three children, following Teal and Tyler, and Jeff and Debbie Trout encouraged their three children to play whatever sport they wanted.
"I think part of the job of being a good parent is to find out what your kid's passions are and try to encourage them to succeed and do well in them and follow their gut," Jeff Trout said, "and give them the opportunities to do well in what they like to do."
Jeff Trout was a history teacher, and he had been the head coach at Millville High School until about the time Mike began his climb through youth sports. When Mike reached his freshman year, Jeff did not try to get involved with the baseball team. "He had heard what he needed to hear from me baseball-wise by the age of 13 or 14," Jeff said.
Rather, Jeff left the coaching of his son to Roy Hallenbeck and Kenny Williams, the head coach and assistant at Millville High School. Hallenbeck had known the Trouts for years. He had helped when Jeff was the head coach, when Mike was 6 or 7 years old, racing around the Millville practices, happily begging for somebody to pitch to him. Because of that experience around the Trout family, Hallenbeck was not surprised Jeff retreated.
"But it was refreshing," Hallenbeck said, "because he had every right in the world with a résumé that he had as a coach, as a player, as an All-American at Delaware and when he played in the Twins organization.
"He was way more qualified than I was at the time to diagnose problems or whatever. And he never did. He allowed Mike to step back and fix things. He allowed us to help. And he really just stepped back. That showed a lot of trust -- it's something that Kenny and I will never forget or repay is that trust that he put on us."
Image result for mike trout 2018
The space, Jeff believes, "probably served him well. Not to have Dad there watching over him all the time and breathing down his neck. Not that I ever was overbearing that way, but I think it helped his independence."
Mike Trout says now that he realized what his father was doing, and with the benefit of hindsight, he believes it was exactly the right thing for him.
"Because you're always talking about pressure, and if he's your coach, you want to be so good, and that means he's putting pressure on you to do good," Mike Trout said. "You know the things he's teaching you, and you are going to put pressure on yourself [to do them]."
Said Kenny Williams: "Mike just played. He never felt pressure from his mom and dad. All they did was support him, and [they] certainly made it easier."
The Angels possessed the 24th and 25th picks in the draft in 2009, when Mike Trout was a 17-year-old high school senior, and Morhardt made his case to the team that they should take the outfielder. In a report filed to the Angels on April 19, 2009, Morhardt's words were all capitalized, and he compared Trout's body type to that of an NFL defensive back. "NATURAL STRENGTH WITHOUT LIFTING A WEIGHT," he reported. "AMAZINGLY STRONG! HE SHOULD BE M.L. [Major League] PLAYER BY [age] 20-21."
Morhardt was even more emphatic when speaking to fellow scouts, comparing Trout, his speed and his power to that of a star Morhardt had met as a teenager. "I think I've got Mickey Mantle up here," Morhardt told another scout. "Wait 'til you see this one."
Morhardt, who now scouts for the Atlanta Braves, recalled, "When you watched his makeup on the field and his physical ability, you knew that when he struggled with something, it wasn't going to last very long. You knew he was going to work hard.
"He had that -- I don't know if you want to say killer instinct -- but he had that mentality of, 'I'm going to conquer this hurdle.' He was ahead of us coaches or scouts. He was very respectful, and he'd say something like, 'Yeah, Coach.' But you knew he was going to go past all of the instruction, and he was going to do it the way how he knows to do it the best. It's like a great pianist or a mathematician. Mike was advanced further than the people who were coaching him."
A few hours before the draft, Angels scouting director Eddie Bane called Morhardt one last time to ask him again about Trout, to get assurances that Trout would want to sign to play pro ball if he were drafted, rather than attend the college to which he had committed, East Carolina.
When a scout reports to his team on a player, he is expected to go beyond an evaluation of the player's ability, beyond his speed or power. He is expected to have some sense of the kid's background, his motivation, his emotional stability, his family.
Bane would not tip his hand to Morhardt as to whether the Angels would draft Trout; that was top-secret information, especially for a team that would have to wait out 23 picks before its first shot at him. And the Angels knew that Oakland's Billy Beane had seen Trout in person, as had the Giants' Brian Sabean.
Absolutely, Morhardt assured Bane, Mike Trout would sign if he were drafted.
The family and the kid's makeup? Of course he could vouch for all of the Trouts. "You knew Jeff was hard-nosed and disciplined, but balanced," Morhardt recalled, "and Debbie the same way. Then, when you see Mike and his hard work and his discipline and his respect for authority. ... Everything you put on that side of the ledger can only be a positive."
"Now you're just looking at the ability. ... Then it was, 'Man, I don't know how we're gonna get this kid.'"
That night, after the Angels drafted Randal Grichuk with the 24th pick, Morhardt got a text from his bosses: The Angels were taking Mike Trout. Morhardt stood up, raised his arms over his head and all but shouted, "We got him."
The Angels got Trouter's son, the kid who could run faster than anybody else, who seemed stronger than anybody else, who played with such an overflowing joy.
Mike Trout had already won an MVP award and finished runner-up in the voting for two others when he was asked on Father's Day three years ago whether his father regularly offered thoughts and observations about his swing.
After all, nobody is more intimately familiar with the outfielder's hitting mechanics than Jeff Trout, a former All-American who knows about hitting, who was there when Mike Trout took his first swings and began to design his own approach at the plate.
Nah, Mike answered, through his irrepressible grin. His dad never really talked about that.
No postgame texts with a reference to a home run or a strikeout?
Well, Mike said, there are texts before and after every game with his dad and his mom and his girlfriend, Jessica (now his wife). But none of them has to do with baseball.
What are they about? Superstition? Wishes for good luck?
"I just tell them I love them, stuff like that," he said. "And they tell me they love me back."
Related:
Isn’t  it  enough  that  Mike  Trout  is  baseball’s  best  player  today?-